History
  • No items yet
midpage
2011 Ohio 6483
Ohio Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Relator filed a mandamus action seeking a ruling on a January 21, 2011 motion to correct an improper sentence in state court proceedings (CR-435228).
  • Respondent moved for summary judgment on September 20, 2011; Brooks did not file a response.
  • The trial court’s action (through a journal entry) denied Brooks’s motion to correct the sentence, making the relief sought moot.
  • The court held the petition defective for improper captioning, failing to name the proper respondent and state the correct caption under R.C. 2731.04.
  • Brooks also failed to comply with R.C. 2969.25 and Local Rule 45(B)(1)(a), warranting dismissal and denial of indigency status.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Captioning defect invalidates the mandamus Brooks seeks relief in the state-relation form. Caption misnaming requires dismissal. Dismissal granted; writ denied.
Mootness due to underlying ruling N/A Journal entry shows denial of motions, rendering mandamus moot. Moot; writ denied.
Noncompliance with RC 2969.25 Relator complied; indigency sought. Met requirement for affidavits detailing prior actions. Dismissal for failure to comply; indigency denied.
Lack of required affidavit under Local Rule 45 Affidavit provided details of claim. No compliant affidavit. Dismissal; mandamus denied.

Key Cases Cited

  • Maloney v. Court of Common Pleas of Allen Cty., 173 Ohio St. 226 (1962) (captioning and mandamus requirements.)
  • State ex rel. Larry Calloway v. Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga Cty., Cuyahoga App. No. 71699 (1997) (improper captioning warrants dismissal.)
  • State ex rel. Samuels v. Mun. Court, Cuyahoga App. No. 67762 (1994) (captioning defects require dismissal.)
  • State ex rel. White v. Villanueva, Cuyahoga App. No. 66009 (1993) (captioning defects render mandamus improper.)
  • State ex rel. Zanders v. Ohio Parole Bd., 82 Ohio St.3d 421 (1998) (mandamus standards and relator requirements.)
  • State ex rel. Alford v. Winters, 80 Ohio St.3d 285 (1997) (inmate-relator procedural prerequisites.)
  • State ex rel. Pamer v. Collier, 108 Ohio St.3d 492 (2006) (affidavits and financial status requirements for indigency.)
  • State ex rel. Hunter v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 88 Ohio St.3d 176 (2000) (procedural prerequisites for mandamus relief.)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Brooks
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Dec 13, 2011
Citations: 2011 Ohio 6483; 97198
Docket Number: 97198
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In
    State v. Brooks, 2011 Ohio 6483