State v. Brandon Morrison(076379)
151 A.3d 561
| N.J. | 2016Background
- Morrison, a volunteer EMT and treasurer of the private, non-profit Pemberton Rescue Squad, was indicted for theft-related offenses and second-degree official misconduct for allegedly forging checks and misusing Squad funds totaling over $20,000.
- The Squad contracted with Pemberton Township for $25,000 annually to provide back-up emergency ambulance services; Lourdes Health System provided primary EMS coverage under a separate contract.
- As treasurer Morrison maintained the checkbook but lacked unilateral authority to expend funds; an audit found $5,345.82 in purchases with no justifiable basis.
- Trial court dismissed the official-misconduct charge, holding a volunteer EMT in a contracted private squad is not a “public servant” under N.J.S.A. 2C:27-1(g); Appellate Division affirmed in a divided panel.
- The State appealed to the New Jersey Supreme Court to determine whether Morrison was a “public servant” for purposes of the official-misconduct statute.
- The Supreme Court affirmed dismissal of the official-misconduct count and remanded the remaining charges, holding that private volunteer EMTs in this contractual context do not perform a uniquely governmental or exclusive public function.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether a volunteer EMT in a private, municipally‑contracted rescue squad is a “public servant” under N.J.S.A. 2C:27‑1(g) for official‑misconduct purposes | Morrison performed a governmental function; legislative benefits, public funding, and authority (e.g., emergency lights) make EMTs like volunteer firefighters and thus subject to official‑misconduct | Private squad members perform services also provided by private entities (e.g., hospitals); contracting and public funds alone do not convert them into public servants; statute must give fair notice | The Court held Morrison was not a public servant: private, contracted EMTs do not exercise uniquely governmental authority nor perform functions exclusive to government in any traditional sense; official‑misconduct charge dismissed |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Perez, 185 N.J. 204 (2005) (private agent acted as government alter ego when delegated uniquely governmental DMV functions)
- State v. Mason, 355 N.J. Super. 296 (App. Div. 2002) (private nonprofit education contractor not a public servant though funded by public dollars)
- State v. Williams, 189 N.J. Super. 61 (App. Div. 1983) (mere receipt of public funds does not create public‑office status)
- State v. Quezada, 402 N.J. Super. 277 (App. Div. 2008) (volunteer firefighter can be a public servant because firefighting is a traditional governmental function)
- State v. Vickery, 275 N.J. Super. 648 (Law Div. 1994) (S.P.C.A. agent with statutory enforcement powers treated as public servant)
- Groman v. Township of Manalapan, 47 F.3d 628 (3d Cir. 1995) (volunteer first‑aid squad receiving public funds not a state actor for §1983 purposes)
- Eggleston v. Prince Edward Volunteer Rescue Squad, 569 F. Supp. 1344 (E.D. Va. 1983) (rescue squads not performing an exclusive public function)
- Jackson v. Metro. Edison Co., 419 U.S. 345 (1974) (private entity is a state actor only when exercising powers traditionally or exclusively reserved to the State)
