History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Brady
2014 Ohio 5721
Ohio Ct. App.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Brady was driving the Ford Explorer involved in a snowy January 18, 2009 crash on Meridian Rd, Youngstown; the Sunfire driver died, and Brady fled the scene but was later found behind a dumpster near B&R Wholesale Tires.
  • Road conditions were extremely hazardous; Officer Mikus could not drive the speed limit; Brady’s tires were worn/unsafe; debris and damage were extensive to both vehicles.
  • Detective Garcar opined Brady crossed the center line and drove over 35 mph in icy conditions; tire tread on Brady’s vehicle was minimal.
  • OSHP crash data recovered from the Sunfire indicated the other vehicle’s speed before airbag deployment ranged from approximately 42 mph down to 29 mph in the seconds preceding deployment.
  • Brady was charged with facilitating an accident, and aggravated vehicular homicide; the jury found him not guilty of the more serious count but convicted him of vehicular homicide, a first-degree misdemeanor, after the jury trial.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the vehicular homicide conviction was supported by sufficient evidence Brady’s conduct met the requisite negligence level. Evidence did not show substantial lapse from due care. Conviction supported by manifest weight and sufficient evidence.
Whether the trial court properly admitted the accident reconstruction testimony Garcar’s qualifications and data supported admissibility. Testimony relied on scientifically unreliable speed causation. Admission of Garcar’s testimony was proper; she qualified as an accident reconstruction expert.

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Thompkins, 78 Ohio St.3d 380 (Ohio 1997) (sufficiency vs. weight distinction for criminal convictions)
  • State v. Goff, 82 Ohio St.3d 123 (Ohio 1998) (standard for reviewing sufficiency of evidence)
  • State v. Whitmaker, 111 Ohio App.3d 608 (Ohio 6th Dist. 1996) (excessive speed under varying conditions supports negligence)
  • State v. Monigold, 2004-Ohio-1554 (Ohio 7th Dist.) (recklessness may arise in winter road conditions at posted speeds)
  • State v. DeWalt, 2007-Ohio-5248 (Ohio 7th Dist.) (trial court abuse standard for expert testimony of accident reconstruction)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Brady
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Dec 26, 2014
Citation: 2014 Ohio 5721
Docket Number: 13-MA-88
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.