History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Black
400 S.C. 10
S.C.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Black was convicted of CSC with a minor in the first degree and lewd act upon a minor, based on an incident in May 2006.
  • Bush, a defense witness, testified with Petitioner denying the alleged misconduct; Bush corroborated Petitioner’s version.
  • Before cross-examining Bush, the State sought to impeach him with two Florida manslaughter convictions from 1987.
  • The trial court admitted the Florida convictions for impeachment; Bush testified to the priors and the proceedings occurred in 2007.
  • Black and Bush were cross-examined; the jury heard Bush’s remote convictions and the defense’s other impeachment evidence (shooting/throwing a deadly missile).
  • On appeal, the court held the admission of the remote convictions was improper but harmless, affirming the convictions.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether remote manslaughter convictions were admissible Black argues 609(b) ten-year limit barred admission. State contends remote convictions have high impeachment value for credibility. Admission was improper under Rule 609(b).
Whether the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt The error affected Bush’s credibility and tainted the defense. Other evidence and Petitioner’s own credibility mitigated impact. Error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.
Did the trial court properly balance probative value and prejudice under Rule 609(b) Court failed to articulate specific facts; probative value did not outweigh prejudice. Court weighed factors and found substantial probative value. Balance found in favor of admission; later reversal due to error.

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Colf, 337 S.C. 622 (2000) (remote convictions require exceptional circumstances to admit)
  • State v. Johnson, 363 S.C. 53 (2005) (ten-year rule presumption; outweighing standard)
  • Cavender, 578 F.2d 528 (4th Cir. 1978) (impeachment value; violent crimes generally less probative of truthfulness)
  • Beahm, 664 F.2d 414 (4th Cir. 1981) (limits on admissions of remote convictions)
  • Van Arsdall, 475 U.S. 673 (1986) (harmless-error factors for credibility rulings)
  • State v. Holmes, 320 S.C. 259 (1995) (Van Arsdall factors apply to credibility errors)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Black
Court Name: Supreme Court of South Carolina
Date Published: Oct 3, 2012
Citation: 400 S.C. 10
Docket Number: Appellate Case No.2010-173048; No. 27176
Court Abbreviation: S.C.