History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Biber
365 N.C. 162
| N.C. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Defendant Benzion Biber was indicted for felonious possession of cocaine and moved to suppress evidence from a motel-room search.
  • The search occurred at Motel 6 Room 312 in Asheville after the manager Harvin reported drug activity in the room.
  • Harvin informed Officers Presnell and Spinda; they entered the room and observed drug paraphernalia and a bag containing a white powder later tested as cocaine.
  • Defendant claimed the room and its contents, including a clothing bag, were his; he also handed two rocks of crack cocaine to an officer later claiming them as his.
  • The trial court found probable cause to arrest for possession and denied the suppression motion; defendant pled guilty while preserving the right to appeal.
  • The Court of Appeals reversed, holding the trial court erred due to lack of evidence on constructive possession and probable cause; the North Carolina Supreme Court granted review.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether officers had probable cause to arrest for possession State: facts supported probable cause to arrest for possession. Biber: insufficient facts to prove possession or control. Probable cause existed to arrest for possession.
Appropriate standard and review for suppression rulings State: trial court's findings supported upholding suppression ruling; de novo review applicable on appeal. Biber: Court of Appeals applied incorrect analysis requiring constructive-possession elements as condition for denial of suppression. Court of Appeals' analysis rejected; de novo review affirmed that probable cause existed.

Key Cases Cited

  • Brinegar v. United States, 338 U.S. 160 (Supreme Court 1949) (probable cause requires reasonable ground for belief, not proof of guilt)
  • Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 (Supreme Court 1983) (probable cause based on totality of circumstances)
  • State v. Harris, 279 N.C. 307 (N.C. 1971) (probable cause and reasonable grounds substantially equivalent)
  • Bone v. State, 354 N.C. 1 (N.C. 2001) (informant corroborated by officer's knowledge permissible)
  • State v. McCollum, 334 N.C. 208 (N.C. 1993) (conclusions of law reviewed de novo)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Biber
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Jun 16, 2011
Citation: 365 N.C. 162
Docket Number: 423A10
Court Abbreviation: N.C.