State v. Best
214 N.C. App. 39
N.C. Ct. App.2011Background
- Van driven by Best stopped shortly after midnight for a supposedly inoperable license plate light; three occupants were in the van.
- A loaded Smith & Wesson .38 revolver was found in the van, partially concealed and near the driver's area.
- Best admitted ownership of the revolver after initial denial.
- Parker testified that Best had previously carried the gun and that Best had been carrying it that day.
- Defendant was charged with possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and carrying a concealed weapon, and pled guilty to habitual felon status.
- The trial court found nine prior record points (Level IV) and sentenced Best to 107–138 months; verdicts were upheld on appeal.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sufficiency of the evidence for possession of a firearm by a felon | Best contends the State failed to prove possession | Defense argues insufficiency to show possession | Evidence supported both convictions (possession and concealment) |
| Ineffective assistance of counsel | No prejudice from belated suppression motion | Counsel's delay prejudiced defense | No reversible error; no prejudice shown |
| Calculation of prior record level | Use of prior convictions to determine Level IV status | Double-counting the same conviction violates policy | Calculation proper; no double-counting error under raised authorities |
| Double-counting concern with habitual felon vs. firearm by felon convictions | Possession by felon is separate offense, permitting use for prior record level | Gentry prohibits double-counting | Allowed to use same conviction for guilt and prior record level; no error |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Chapman, 359 N.C. 328 (North Carolina Supreme Court, 2005) (sufficiency; standard for reviewing motion to dismiss)
- State v. Abshire, 363 N.C. 322 (North Carolina Supreme Court, 2009) (substantial evidence standard; required for sufficiency review)
- State v. McNeil, 359 N.C. 800 (North Carolina Supreme Court, 2005) (substantial evidence and possession concepts; review under McNeil)
