History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Berrien
2015 Ohio 4450
Ohio Ct. App.
2015
Read the full case

Background

  • In 2005, a jury found Berrien guilty of attempted murder, aggravated robbery, and felonious assault and he was sentenced to 10 years with up to 5 years postrelease control and costs.
  • On direct appeal, convictions were affirmed but remanded for resentencing under Foster v. Ohio to correct sentencing.
  • In 2007, on remand, the trial court resentenced Berrien to 10 years with 5 years postrelease control and costs.
  • In 2014, Berrien, pro se, filed a motion for re-sentencing alleging a void judgment; the trial court denied it.
  • Appellant appeals asserting two errors: (1) failure to notify about potential community-service for unpaid costs; (2) improper postrelease-control terms and related mandatory language.
  • The appellate court reviews postconviction relief petitions under abuse-of-discretion and applies res judicata to preclude arguments not raised on direct appeal.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Notify re costs and community service Berrien argues void sentence due to lack of notification on potential community service. Berrien contends trial court failed to adequately inform about costs leading to community service. First assignment overruled; res judicata bars relitigation; inability to review without transcript; error deemed reversible, not void.
Postrelease control and mandatory language Berrien argues the judgment failed to state postrelease control was mandatory and misapplied statutorily. State contends proper five-year postrelease control was imposed and notification eventually corrected on remand. Second assignment overruled; postrelease control properly imposed and advised; no reversible error.

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Reynolds, 79 Ohio St.3d 158 (1997) (postconviction relief defined; collateral attack)
  • State v. Calhoun, 86 Ohio St.3d 279 (1999) (abuse-of-discretion standard in postconviction relief)
  • State v. Bayless, 2014-Ohio-2475 (12th Dist. Clinton) (res judicata in postconviction relief)
  • State v. Wagers, 2012-Ohio-2258 (12th Dist. Preble) (abuse of discretion; standard for postconviction relief)
  • State v. Perry, 10 Ohio St.2d 175 (1967) (res judicata doctrine)
  • State v. Weathers, 2013-Ohio-1104 (12th Dist. Butler) (community-service notification remedy and costs)
  • State v. Graham, 2015-Ohio-576 (12th Dist. Warren) (effects of failure to notify on sentencing issues; res judicata)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Berrien
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Oct 26, 2015
Citation: 2015 Ohio 4450
Docket Number: CA2015-02-004
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.