State v. Berrien
2015 Ohio 4450
Ohio Ct. App.2015Background
- In 2005, a jury found Berrien guilty of attempted murder, aggravated robbery, and felonious assault and he was sentenced to 10 years with up to 5 years postrelease control and costs.
- On direct appeal, convictions were affirmed but remanded for resentencing under Foster v. Ohio to correct sentencing.
- In 2007, on remand, the trial court resentenced Berrien to 10 years with 5 years postrelease control and costs.
- In 2014, Berrien, pro se, filed a motion for re-sentencing alleging a void judgment; the trial court denied it.
- Appellant appeals asserting two errors: (1) failure to notify about potential community-service for unpaid costs; (2) improper postrelease-control terms and related mandatory language.
- The appellate court reviews postconviction relief petitions under abuse-of-discretion and applies res judicata to preclude arguments not raised on direct appeal.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Notify re costs and community service | Berrien argues void sentence due to lack of notification on potential community service. | Berrien contends trial court failed to adequately inform about costs leading to community service. | First assignment overruled; res judicata bars relitigation; inability to review without transcript; error deemed reversible, not void. |
| Postrelease control and mandatory language | Berrien argues the judgment failed to state postrelease control was mandatory and misapplied statutorily. | State contends proper five-year postrelease control was imposed and notification eventually corrected on remand. | Second assignment overruled; postrelease control properly imposed and advised; no reversible error. |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Reynolds, 79 Ohio St.3d 158 (1997) (postconviction relief defined; collateral attack)
- State v. Calhoun, 86 Ohio St.3d 279 (1999) (abuse-of-discretion standard in postconviction relief)
- State v. Bayless, 2014-Ohio-2475 (12th Dist. Clinton) (res judicata in postconviction relief)
- State v. Wagers, 2012-Ohio-2258 (12th Dist. Preble) (abuse of discretion; standard for postconviction relief)
- State v. Perry, 10 Ohio St.2d 175 (1967) (res judicata doctrine)
- State v. Weathers, 2013-Ohio-1104 (12th Dist. Butler) (community-service notification remedy and costs)
- State v. Graham, 2015-Ohio-576 (12th Dist. Warren) (effects of failure to notify on sentencing issues; res judicata)
