History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Benjamin Charette
189 A.3d 67
Vt.
2018
Read the full case

Background

  • Defendant exchanged messages online with an account he believed to be a 13‑year‑old girl and agreed to meet for sex; the account was an undercover adult police officer.
  • Defendant pled guilty to attempted luring of a child under 13 V.S.A. § 2828 and received an agreed sentence, with the registration issue reserved.
  • Trial court ordered defendant to register as a sex offender under 13 V.S.A. § 5401(10)(B), which covers listed offenses “against a victim who is a minor” and expressly includes attempts.
  • Defendant appealed, arguing the statute requires an actual minor victim and thus does not apply when the purported victim is an undercover adult.
  • The State argued the statute’s inclusion of attempts means it covers convictions where the offender intended to target a minor, even if the victim was fictitious or an undercover officer.
  • The Supreme Court affirmed, holding the registration requirement applies when the defendant believed the victim was a minor.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether sex‑offender registration under 13 V.S.A. § 5401(10)(B) applies when the convicted offense was an attempt directed at a putative minor who was actually an undercover adult Registration applies because statute covers attempts directed at a minor and protects public safety Registration does not apply because the statute requires an actual, real minor victim Registration applies: statute’s inclusion of attempts and purpose show it covers attempted offenses against a putative minor the defendant believed to be underage

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Thompson, 174 Vt. 172 (2002) (statutory interpretation should effectuate legislative intent and consider the statute as a whole)
  • State v. Kerr, 143 Vt. 597 (1983) (court will not read language into a statute unless necessary)
  • Spivey v. State, 619 S.E.2d 346 (Ga. Ct. App. 2005) (attempted internet sexual offenses involving an undercover officer require sex‑offender registration)
  • Czyzewski v. N.H. Dep’t of Safety, 70 A.3d 444 (N.H. 2013) (registration statute applying to victims under 18 covers attempts where defendant subjectively believed the victim was a minor)
  • Colbert v. Commonwealth, 624 S.E.2d 108 (Va. Ct. App. 2006) (solicitation to a purported minor in a sting falls within the statute’s evil and requires registration)
  • People v. Buerge, 240 P.3d 363 (Colo. App. 2009) (when statute includes attempts, “victim” in relevant provisions can mean the intended victim)
  • United States v. Dodge, 597 F.3d 1347 (11th Cir. 2010) (federal registration statute applies when defendant believed the target was a minor)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Benjamin Charette
Court Name: Supreme Court of Vermont
Date Published: Apr 27, 2018
Citation: 189 A.3d 67
Docket Number: 2017-147
Court Abbreviation: Vt.