369 P.3d 438
Or. Ct. App.2016Background
- Defendant was indicted on multiple sex-related counts; Count 1 charged first-degree sodomy (ORS 163.405) alleging he “knowingly... by forcible compulsion” caused the victim to engage in deviate sexual intercourse.
- The victim (defendant’s wife) testified defendant pushed her face-first onto the bed after she said “no” and anally raped her; she denied any prior consensual sexual role‑playing involving such force.
- Defendant denied the allegations, claiming the incidents never occurred.
- The trial court instructed the jury using an outdated UCrJI that omitted a required culpable‑mental‑state instruction (i.e., that the defendant knowingly subjected the victim to forcible compulsion). Defendant did not object.
- Jury convicted on Count 1 (first‑degree sodomy) among other counts; court sentenced defendant to lengthy prison terms and ordered $8,000 in court‑appointed attorney fees.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether omission of a jury instruction that forcible‑compulsion must be accompanied by a culpable mental state ("knowingly") is plain error | State concedes Nelson and Gray require a mental‑state instruction but argues error should not be corrected because defendant may have chosen not to object | Defendant argues omission is plain error under Nelson/Gray and review is warranted | Court: Failure to instruct was plain error under Nelson/Gray, but error was harmless on these facts (similar to Ross) because the jury necessarily credited testimony showing forcible compulsion and no evidence suggested lack of knowledge |
| Whether ordering $8,000 in court‑appointed attorney fees without a record showing defendant "is or may be able" to pay is plain error | State points to prior employment evidence (years earlier) and argues it supports imposition | Defendant argues record is silent about present or future ability to pay; fees improper absent proof | Court: Trial court plainly erred in imposing $8,000 in fees; appellate court exercises discretion to correct error and reverses the fee award |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Nelson, 241 Or App 681 (discusses that “subjected to forcible compulsion” requires a culpable mental state)
- State v. Gray, 261 Or App 121 (failure to instruct on mental state for forcible compulsion is plain error)
- State v. Ross, 271 Or App 1 (similar instructional error held harmless where evidence compelled finding of knowing forcible compulsion)
- State v. Mejia‑Espinoza, 267 Or App 682 (trial court plainly erred imposing attorney fees absent evidence defendant could pay; appellate court corrected error)
- State v. Coverstone, 260 Or App 714 (court cannot impose court‑appointed attorney fees without evidence defendant is or may be able to pay)
