History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Beehn
927 N.W.2d 793
Neb.
2019
Read the full case

Background

  • Nov. 24, 2012: altercation outside a Norfolk bar; Jordan Beehn struck Jose Zepada with a handgun and fatally shot Jorge Zepada, paralyzing him.
  • Beehn was charged with multiple offenses including first-degree assault (Jorge), second-degree assault (Jose), firearm enhancements, tampering with a witness (letter to his wife), and bribery; ultimately pled no contest to first-degree assault and tampering with a witness.
  • Plea (Dec. 2013): State dismissed remaining counts; court accepted plea and sentenced Beehn to concurrent 50–50 years and 12–12 months (aggregate 50–50 years).
  • Direct appeal raised only excessive sentence; affirmed by Nebraska Court of Appeals.
  • Postconviction: Beehn alleged ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel (failure to advise re: self-defense/defense-of-others, failure to advise plea waived appeals of pretrial rulings, inadequate investigation/depositions, incorrect advice about spousal privilege, and appellate counsel’s failures). District court held an evidentiary hearing and denied relief; Nebraska Supreme Court affirmed.

Issues

Issue Beehn's Argument State/Defense Argument Held
Trial counsel failed to advise availability of self-defense / defense of others Counsel never informed him these defenses existed / would have gone to trial if so informed Counsel uniformly discussed and evaluated those defenses but found them unlikely to succeed given facts, inconsistent stories, and admissions (e.g., accidental discharge) No deficient performance; counsel advised him and defenses were unlikely to succeed
Counsel failed to advise that plea waived appeals of pretrial rulings He was not told pleas would waive appeals of adverse pretrial rulings Counsel (Martin/McCarthy) advised that pleading would waive rights and pretrial appeals; plea colloquy covered waivers No deficient performance; Beehn was advised and waived rights knowingly
Counsel failed to investigate/depose witnesses Attorneys did not interview or depose many potential witnesses, including 10 added by State Counsel obtained depositions/interviews, investigator searched for evidence (e.g., cameras); additional witnesses were jailhouse witnesses and unfavorable or detrimental; some interviews revealed harmful information (e.g., jail conduct, attempted witness payment) No deficient performance; additional investigation would not have produced beneficial evidence or changed outcome
Counsel misadvised about spousal privilege (communications with wife) Counsel told him communications with wife were privileged and not usable by State Counsel repeatedly told Beehn not to discuss case; multiple attorneys testified they advised that spousal privilege likely did not apply; recorded call corroborates advice to avoid discussing case No deficient performance; record shows counsel warned against communications and advised privilege likely inapplicable
Appellate counsel ineffective for failing to raise trial counsel claims or to meet with Beehn Appellate counsel should have raised ineffective-assistance claims and met with him Appellate counsel reviewed record, concluded ineffective-assistance claims lacked merit, met with Beehn (via deputy), and offered new counsel option; even if deficient, no prejudice because district court entertained collateral claims and found them meritless No prejudice; appellate representation not shown to have caused different result; postconviction hearing addressed claims and denied relief

Key Cases Cited

  • Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (two-prong ineffective assistance standard)
  • State v. McGuire, 299 Neb. 762 (review standards for postconviction and ineffective assistance)
  • State v. Haynes, 299 Neb. 249 (postconviction relief scope)
  • State v. Yos-Chiguil, 281 Neb. 618 (consideration of likelihood of defense success in plea/prejudice analysis)
  • State v. Armendariz, 289 Neb. 896 (justification / self-defense principles)
  • State v. Barrera-Garrido, 296 Neb. 647 (self-serving declarations insufficient to show would have gone to trial)
  • State v. Blank, 239 Neb. 188 (prejudice requirement post-Strickland)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Beehn
Court Name: Nebraska Supreme Court
Date Published: May 24, 2019
Citation: 927 N.W.2d 793
Docket Number: S-18-603
Court Abbreviation: Neb.