State v. BECKELHEIMER
211 N.C. App. 362
| N.C. Ct. App. | 2011Background
- Indicted 23 June 2008 on three counts of taking indecent liberties with a child and one count of statutory sexual offense; superseding indictment 1 June 2009 added first-degree sexual offense.
- 4 May 2009 defendant moved to exclude evidence of uncharged acts under Rule 404(b) and related rules; sought to bar testimony by victim's half-brother about past sexual behavior.
- 3 August 2009 trial in Chatham County; evidence included testimony from the victim and the half-brother about prior acts years earlier.
- July 2007 incident: 11-year-old victim, defendant 27, alleged sexual touching and kissing; victim testified to earlier touching on two occasions.
- Court admitted half-brother Ronnie Branson’s testimony about prior sexual conduct with defendant; testimony was contested as 404(b) evidence and potential prejudice.
- 7 August 2009 jury convicted defendant on all counts; trial court sentenced indecent liberties counts 16–20 months and first-degree sexual offense 192–240 months, with the latter concurrent; defendant appealed.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Admissibility of Branson testimony under Rule 404(b) | State argues similarity and probative value support admissibility. | Beckelheimer contends acts are dissimilar and remote, warrant exclusion. | Testimony excluded due to lack of sufficient similarity; but reversal on prejudice regardless. |
| Prejudice from admission of Branson testimony | Admission was probative and did not prejudice the defense. | Evidence risked convicting him by character rather than proof of crime. | Prejudice established; new trial granted. |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Al-Bayyinah, 356 N.C. 150 (2002) (limits and guides 404(b) admissibility for similarity and prejudice)
- State v. Bowman, 188 N.C. App. 635 (2008) (similarity and temporal proximity required for 404(b) evidence)
- State v. Stevenson, 169 N.C. App. 797 (2005) (balancing probative value against prejudice under 403)
- State v. Dixon, 77 N.C. App. 27 (1985) (concurrence of common features needed for 404(b) relevance)
- State v. Carpenter, 361 N.C. 382 (2007) (similarity and remoteness in time required for 404(b) evidence)
