70 So. 3d 1
La. Ct. App.2011Background
- Barnett was convicted by a jury of second degree murder and attempted second degree murder, with life imprisonment and 50 years respectively, to run consecutively.
- The crimes involved the killing of Richard Eligah and stabbing/attempted murder of Herman White, followed by setting the mobile home on fire.
- There were five knives recovered at the scene; cause of Eligah's death could not be determined, but inhalation of smoke occurred.
- The trial court sentenced Barnett to life imprisonment without probation etc. for murder and 50 years for attempted murder, running consecutively; restitution of $15,000 to White was ordered.
- Barnett did not file a motion to reconsider sentence; issues on appeal included nonunanimous verdict and sentence excessiveness.
- The court of appeal affirmed both convictions and sentences, addressing the constitutionality of nonunanimous verdicts and whether the consecutive sentence was excessive.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Constitutionality of nonunanimous verdict | Barnett argues Art. 782 nonunanimous verdicts are unconstitutional. | Barnett contends Louisiana permits nonunanimous verdicts in hard labor cases, violating Sixth Amendment. | Art. 782 constitutional; assignments lacks merit. |
| Excessiveness of consecutive sentences | 50-year consecutive sentence plus life sentence is excessive given circumstances. | Consecutive sentences justified by gravity, prior history, and offenses; not disproportionate. | Not unconstitutionally excessive; consecutive terms supported by record; affirm. |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Bertrand, 6 So. 3d 738 (La. 2009) (upheld constitutionality of nonunanimous verdicts in hard labor cases)
- State v. Edwards, 420 So. 2d 663 (La. 1982) (early validation of Article 782 jurisprudence)
- State v. Simmons, 414 So. 2d 705 (La. 1982) (nonunanimous verdicts permissible in certain crimes)
- State v. Jones, 381 So. 2d 416 (La. 1980) (nonunanimous verdict authority relied upon by court)
- State v. Winslow, 55 So. 3d 910 (La.App. 2d Cir. 2010) (reaffirmed constitutionality of nonunanimous verdicts)
- State v. Blow, 46 So. 3d 735 (La.App. 2d Cir. 2010) (nonunanimous verdicts sustained on appeal)
- State v. Malone, 998 So. 2d 322 (La.App. 2d Cir. 2008) (articulates standards for nonunanimous verdicts)
- State v. Divers, 889 So. 2d 335 (La.App. 2d Cir. 2004) (discusses review of consecutive sentences)
- State v. Johnson, 962 So. 2d 1126 (La.App. 2d Cir. 2007) (requires articulation of factors for consecutive terms)
- State v. Derry, 516 So. 2d 1284 (La.App. 2d Cir. 1987) (concurrent vs. consecutive sentencing discretion)
- State v. Boudreaux, 945 So. 2d 898 (La.App. 2d Cir. 2006) (consecutive sentence justification considerations)