State v. Baker
111915
Kan.Jun 9, 2017Background
- Baker was arrested in a public retail store in Lawrence on outstanding warrants; he had a blue backpack with him which officers seized for safekeeping.
- Officers Halsted searched Baker’s backpack at the scene and found needles in a Nintendo game case, then searched a bag inside the backpack in an evidence room and found methamphetamine.
- Baker moved to suppress the warrantless backpack search as unconstitutional and argued the evidence would not have been inevitably discovered through an inventory search.
- The district court denied suppression, finding no probable cause but that the evidence would have been inevitably discovered via an inventory search; the court relied on a claimed policy to search arrestee bags.
- The Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction; the Kansas Supreme Court reversed and remanded, holding no proven standardized inventory routine; the inevitable-discovery claim failed.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Was the backpack seizure reasonable under the totality of circumstances? | Baker argues the seizure was unlawful custody. | Baker contends no lawful custody/standards justified seizure. | Yes; seizure reasonable under totality of circumstances. |
| Did the State prove inevitable discovery via a standardized inventory procedure? | State lacked evidence of a standardized criteria or routine. | State relied on jail policy to inventory search bags. | No; no proven standardized procedure; no inevitable discovery. |
| Must inventory searches be governed by standardized criteria or established routines for containers? | Baker argues no established policy; policy lacking. | State claims routine would have opened containers. | Wells rule requires standardized criteria or routine; not shown here. |
Key Cases Cited
- Lafayette, 462 U.S. 640 (U.S. Supreme Court 1983) (inventory searches serve legitimate governmental interests and protect property)
- Bertine, 479 U.S. 367 (U.S. Supreme Court 1987) (inventory procedures protect property and guard police from danger)
- Wells, 495 U.S. 1 (U.S. Supreme Court 1990) (standardized criteria required for container openings during inventory searches)
- Perea, 986 F.2d 633 (2d Cir. 1993) (inventory/opening containers per established procedures permissible)
