History
  • No items yet
midpage
830 N.W.2d 906
Minn. Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Bakdash charged with second-degree murder and two counts of second-degree assault (April 2011).
  • Indicted by grand jury on first-degree murder and two counts of attempted first-degree murder (May 2011).
  • State pursued twelve charges at trial, including multiple theories of murder/attempted murder and related assaults.
  • Evidence showed vehicle used as a weapon striking multiple victims on a one-way street in Dinkytown, Minneapolis.
  • Defense argued transferred intent should not apply to unintended victims; jury convicted on remaining counts; sentences imposed consecutively for murder and attempted murder.
  • Issue of grand jury transcripts raised on disclosure and alleged indictment amendment.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether transferred intent was properly included in jury instructions Bakdash contends transferred intent not applicable to unintended victims Bakdash claims doctrine should not inflate specific-intent charges Yes; transferred intent properly included in instructions.
Whether indictment was constructively amended by transferring theory at trial Bakdash argues added theory altered charges not before grand jury State says transferred intent is a theory, not a new offense No; no constructive amendment.
Whether district court erred by denying full grand jury transcript disclosure Bakdash seeks entire grand jury transcript for good cause State argues lack of particularized need; disclosure unnecessary No; no abuse of discretion; lack of particularized need.

Key Cases Cited

  • Holliday, 745 N.W.2d 556 (Minn. 2008) (transferred intent applies when bystander harmed during pursuit of intended victim)
  • Ford, 539 N.W.2d 214 (Minn. 1995) (transferred intent upheld in murder/attempted murder contexts)
  • Cruz-Ramirez, 771 N.W.2d 497 (Minn. 2009) (transferred intent applies where multiple victims in proximity; intent to kill shown broadly)
  • Livingston, 420 N.W.2d 223 (Minn.App. 1988) (transferred intent allowed to imply intent to harm additional victims by weapon use)
  • Merrill, 450 N.W.2d 318 (Minn. 1990) (transferable when harms are substantially similar; differs if harms are different)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Bakdash
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Date Published: May 20, 2013
Citations: 830 N.W.2d 906; 2013 Minn. App. LEXIS 51; 2013 WL 2149884; No. A12-1133
Docket Number: No. A12-1133
Court Abbreviation: Minn. Ct. App.
Log In