midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
2013 Ohio 2852
Ohio Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Matthew W. Bailey was indicted for felonious assault with a firearm, illegal cultivation of marijuana, and four counts of child endangering based on conduct on March 3, 2012.
  • Bailey pled guilty to all counts on July 17, 2012; the court ordered a presentence investigation and scheduled sentencing.
  • Bailey retained new counsel and, on August 10, 2012, moved to withdraw his guilty pleas prior to sentencing, asserting lack of independent counsel at plea and misunderstanding of consequences; he sought to challenge only the felonious assault charge.
  • At the August 27, 2012 hearing, Bailey’s prior counsel was not criticized; counsel conceded representation was adequate. Bailey argued he should have been charged with using a weapon while intoxicated rather than felonious assault.
  • The trial court reviewed the plea transcript, found the Crim.R. 11 colloquy adequate, concluded Bailey understood the charges and penalties, found no coercion, and denied the pre-sentence motion to withdraw.
  • The court sentenced Bailey to an aggregate eight-year prison term; Bailey appealed the denial of his motion to withdraw the plea.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the trial court abused its discretion by denying a pre-sentence motion to withdraw guilty pleas State: Trial court properly exercised discretion after full consideration and adequate plea colloquy Bailey: Plea should be withdrawable because he lacked independent counsel earlier and did not understand ramifications; he disputes felonious assault charge Court: Denial affirmed — no abuse of discretion; plea was knowing, voluntary, and counsel was adequate

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Xie, 62 Ohio St.3d 521, 584 N.E.2d 715 (Ohio 1992) (pre-sentence plea withdrawals should be liberally allowed but are discretionary; defendant must show a reasonable and legitimate basis)
  • State v. Cuthbertson, 139 Ohio App.3d 895, 746 N.E.2d 197 (Ohio Ct. App. 2000) (lists nonexclusive Fish factors for evaluating plea-withdrawal motions)
  • State v. Fish, 104 Ohio App.3d 236, 661 N.E.2d 788 (Ohio Ct. App. 1995) (identifies factors for courts to consider when ruling on motions to withdraw guilty pleas)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Bailey
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jun 28, 2013
Citations: 2013 Ohio 2852; 2013 CA 00183
Docket Number: 2013 CA 00183
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In