State v. Bailey
255 P.3d 19
| Kan. | 2011Background
- Bailey, age 17 at the offenses, was certified as an adult for crimes in August 2007 including first-degree murder and aggravated robbery.
- In August 2007 Bailey participated with Starr and Dean in a home invasion targeting drugs; a gun was displayed and marijuana bricks were sought.
- Bailey shot Ricky Stewart during the incident and stole money and drugs from Hicks and Stewart's home.
- Bailey, Starr, and others later divided the proceeds at a vehicle, and Stewart died from gunshot wounds.
- The State prosecuted Bailey as an adult under K.S.A. 2010 Supp. 38-2347; the trial court certified Bailey as an adult after considering eight factors.
- Bailey challenges trial issues on jury instructions, Fifth Amendment concerns, and the admissibility/effect of witnesses Starr and Dean; the jury convicted Bailey on all counts.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether adult certification was proper under 38-2347 | Bailey argues standard/applications under 38-2347 insufficient or misapplied | Bailey contends court used wrong standard or ignored factors | Certification proper; court applied correct factors and standard. |
| Felony murder underlying felonies timing | Bailey contends underlying felonies may have been completed before murder | State says murder occurred during underlying felonies; no break in events | Jury could find murder during underlying felonies; no reversible error. |
| Unanimity instruction for alternate means | Bailey asserts need for unanimity on which underlying felony acted as basis | Under Hooker/Becker, underlying felonies are alternative means | No unanimity required; sufficient evidence supported alternative means. |
| Definition of attempt in felony-murder instruction | Bailey sought definition of 'attempt' in instruction | No evidence of attempted underlying felonies; language surplusage | Omission harmless; no reversible error. |
| Witness Fifth Amendment issues with Starr and Dean testifying | Bailey claims improper coercion and privilege handling | Privilege issues were not preserved; limited prejudice | No reversible error given preservation and context. |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Ellmaker, 289 Kan. 1132, 221 P.3d 1105 (2009) (affirmed evaluation of eight-factor test under current standard)
- State v. Hooker, 271 Kan. 52, 21 P.3d 964 (2001) (alternative means vs multiple acts in felony murder)
- State v. Becker, 290 Kan. 842, 235 P.3d 424 (2010) (alternative means concept for multiple underlying felonies)
- State v. Jackson, 280 Kan. 541, 124 P.3d 460 (2005) (causation/underlying felonies in felony murder instruction)
- State v. Davis, 37 Kan. App. 2d 650, 155 P.3d 1207 (2007) (standard of review for adult certification in this jurisdiction)
