History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Bailey
255 P.3d 19
| Kan. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Bailey, age 17 at the offenses, was certified as an adult for crimes in August 2007 including first-degree murder and aggravated robbery.
  • In August 2007 Bailey participated with Starr and Dean in a home invasion targeting drugs; a gun was displayed and marijuana bricks were sought.
  • Bailey shot Ricky Stewart during the incident and stole money and drugs from Hicks and Stewart's home.
  • Bailey, Starr, and others later divided the proceeds at a vehicle, and Stewart died from gunshot wounds.
  • The State prosecuted Bailey as an adult under K.S.A. 2010 Supp. 38-2347; the trial court certified Bailey as an adult after considering eight factors.
  • Bailey challenges trial issues on jury instructions, Fifth Amendment concerns, and the admissibility/effect of witnesses Starr and Dean; the jury convicted Bailey on all counts.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether adult certification was proper under 38-2347 Bailey argues standard/applications under 38-2347 insufficient or misapplied Bailey contends court used wrong standard or ignored factors Certification proper; court applied correct factors and standard.
Felony murder underlying felonies timing Bailey contends underlying felonies may have been completed before murder State says murder occurred during underlying felonies; no break in events Jury could find murder during underlying felonies; no reversible error.
Unanimity instruction for alternate means Bailey asserts need for unanimity on which underlying felony acted as basis Under Hooker/Becker, underlying felonies are alternative means No unanimity required; sufficient evidence supported alternative means.
Definition of attempt in felony-murder instruction Bailey sought definition of 'attempt' in instruction No evidence of attempted underlying felonies; language surplusage Omission harmless; no reversible error.
Witness Fifth Amendment issues with Starr and Dean testifying Bailey claims improper coercion and privilege handling Privilege issues were not preserved; limited prejudice No reversible error given preservation and context.

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Ellmaker, 289 Kan. 1132, 221 P.3d 1105 (2009) (affirmed evaluation of eight-factor test under current standard)
  • State v. Hooker, 271 Kan. 52, 21 P.3d 964 (2001) (alternative means vs multiple acts in felony murder)
  • State v. Becker, 290 Kan. 842, 235 P.3d 424 (2010) (alternative means concept for multiple underlying felonies)
  • State v. Jackson, 280 Kan. 541, 124 P.3d 460 (2005) (causation/underlying felonies in felony murder instruction)
  • State v. Davis, 37 Kan. App. 2d 650, 155 P.3d 1207 (2007) (standard of review for adult certification in this jurisdiction)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Bailey
Court Name: Supreme Court of Kansas
Date Published: Jul 15, 2011
Citation: 255 P.3d 19
Docket Number: 101,785
Court Abbreviation: Kan.