History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Bailey
41 A.3d 535
| Me. | 2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Bailey convicted of ten counts of gross sexual assault and two counts of unlawful sexual contact in Penobscot County and required to register as a sex offender.
  • Bailey appealed denial of suppression for live-witness testimony and sought suppression of evidence from a police search.
  • This Court previously vacated and remanded in Bailey I to determine whether physical evidence and testimony derived from the initial illegal computer search should be suppressed.
  • Detective Beaulieu illegally searched Bailey’s home computer; after discovering child pornography, Bailey gave verbal consent and a written consent form for a home search.
  • Seven videotapes were found; one tape showed sexual activity with two young girls; Detective Beaulieu showed headshots to Bailey’s daughter, who identified the victims.
  • The trial court suppressed the videotape but allowed the two victims’ live testimony; Bailey contends both should be suppressed as fruits of the illegal search.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Admissibility of the videotape after an illegal search Brown factors show taint; consent did not purge illegality Consent purged taint; videotape admissible under Brown Videotape admissible; taint not fatal under Brown analysis
Admissibility of live-witness testimony identified by the videotape Ceccolini factors require exclusion given link to illegality Ceccolini factors support admission; witnesses voluntarily testified Live-witness testimony admissible under Ceccolini factors
Voluntariness of Bailey’s consent to search Consent not voluntary; taint from initial illegality Written consent was voluntary and independent of illegality Court found Bailey’s consent not voluntary; taint analysis applied to videotape; live testimony treated under Ceccolini

Key Cases Cited

  • Brown v. Illinois, 421 U.S. 590 (Supreme Court 1975) (four Brown factors for taint analysis of post-illegality evidence; voluntariness required)
  • Ceccolini v. United States, 435 U.S. 268 (Supreme Court 1978) (deadlinelike Ceccolini factors for live-witness testimony)
  • State v. LeGassey, 456 A.2d 366 (Me. 1983) (applied Brown to physical evidence in Maine)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Bailey
Court Name: Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Date Published: Apr 12, 2012
Citation: 41 A.3d 535
Docket Number: Pen-11-16
Court Abbreviation: Me.