History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Bagnes
2014 UT 4
| Utah | 2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Bagnes confronted two nine-year-old girls, exposed a diaper worn underneath his shorts, and indicated he wore it for incontinence.
  • He dropped his shorts to reveal the diaper, which was small and partially exposed his pubic area but did not fully expose his buttocks.
  • Bagnes distributed a flyer with images of diaper-clad children and adolescents, including URLs to adult-pornographic sites.
  • The flyers were found by the girls’ mother, who reported the incident to police, leading to Bagnes’s arrest.
  • He was charged with two counts of lewdness involving a child under 76-9-702.5 and one count of sexual exploitation of a minor under 76-5a-3(1).
  • A jury convicted on all counts; the supreme court reversed the lewdness and sexual exploitation convictions, leading to all charges being effectively overturned on those grounds.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the evidence supports lewdness involving a child under 76-9-702.5(1). State contends conduct fits 'any other act of lewdness' under the statute. Bagnes argues there was no lascivious, virtual exposure or similar act as required. Reversed for lack of sufficient evidence; no lascivious, virtual exposure shown.
Whether the evidence supports sexual exploitation of a minor under 76-5a-3(1). State claims flyers depicted lascivious exhibition of pubic region. Bagnes contends flyers did not exhibit the pubic region and thus fail the element. Reversed for lack of exhibition; no child pornography proved.

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Boyd, 25 P.3d 985 (Utah 2001) (sufficiency review and de novo element interpretation)
  • Hi-Country Prop. Rights Grp. v. Emmer, 304 P.3d 851 (Utah 2013) (statutory interpretation; plain meaning vs. context)
  • State ex rel. A.T. v., 84 P.3d 850 (Utah 2001) (ejusdem generis; scope of lewdness)
  • State v. Piep, 84 P.3d 850 (Utah App. 2004) (application of Dost factors to lasciviousness)
  • United States v. Knox, 32 F.3d 733 (3d Cir. 1994) (lascivious exhibition standard for child pornography)
  • Dost, 636 F. Supp. 828 (S.D. Cal. 1986) (factors for lascivious exhibition)
  • Morrison, 2001 UT 73 (Utah 2001) (Dost framework applied in Utah context)
  • Jenkins v. Georgia, 418 U.S. 153 (U.S. 1974) (First Amendment considerations in exhibition contexts)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Bagnes
Court Name: Utah Supreme Court
Date Published: Feb 7, 2014
Citation: 2014 UT 4
Docket Number: 20100882
Court Abbreviation: Utah