State v. Arnold
2017 Ohio 7644
| Ohio Ct. App. | 2017Background
- On December 10, 2015, Toledo officers stopped Marcus Arnold after observing him walking between traffic; a pat-down revealed a .38‑caliber Cobra (no rounds) in his front left pocket, and a physical struggle occurred during arrest.
- Arnold was indicted for having weapons while under disability (third‑degree felony), carrying concealed weapons (fourth‑degree felony), and resisting arrest (second‑degree misdemeanor).
- Arnold pleaded no contest to having weapons while under disability and resisting arrest; carrying concealed weapons was dismissed per plea agreement.
- The trial court imposed community control (including local confinement and work release) but warned it could impose up to 36 months on the weapons charge for violation.
- After Arnold admitted a community‑control violation, the court revoked community control and imposed 36 months’ imprisonment on the weapons count and 90 days on the resisting‑arrest count, to run concurrently.
- Appellate counsel filed an Anders brief asserting no non‑frivolous issues, but identified one potential challenge to sentencing under R.C. 2929.11 and 2929.12; the Sixth District reviewed the record and affirmed, granting counsel leave to withdraw.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the trial court erred by imposing a 36‑month sentence without proper compliance with R.C. 2929.11 and 2929.12 | State: sentence was lawful; court expressly considered R.C. 2929.11/2929.12 and stayed within statutory range | Arnold: trial court failed to properly apply R.C. 2929.11/2929.12, making the maximum sentence contrary to law | Court: affirmed — sentencing entry shows consideration of R.C. 2929.11/2929.12 and 36 months is within the permissible range for a third‑degree felony; sentence not contrary to law |
Key Cases Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) (requires appointed counsel who deems an appeal frivolous to file a brief identifying arguable issues and request to withdraw)
- State v. Duncan, 57 Ohio App.2d 93 (1978) (Ohio application of Anders procedure)
