History
  • No items yet
midpage
112 So. 3d 529
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Deputy observed appellee illegally park on grass marked 'do not park' during a routine area check.
  • By the time the deputy reached appellee, appellee had exited the car and was crossing the street.
  • The deputy motioned appellee to return to the car, asked for a driver’s license, and appellee presented a Florida ID card.
  • Deputy ran appellee’s information on the teletype, which showed multiple suspensions of appellee’s license.
  • The deputy subsequently arrested appellee after appellee acknowledged knowing of the license suspension.
  • The trial court granted appellee’s motion to suppress as an illegal stop.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Was calling appellee back to the vehicle a permissible seizure? Appellee—Levine; stop unlawful, no grounds to detain. State; deputy had authority to call back for a traffic citation. Yes; deputy could call back and issue a citation.
Did the deputy have probable cause to conduct a traffic stop for parking violation? Appellee parked on grass in violation; stop valid. State; observed parking violation justifies stop. Yes; probable cause existed to stop for parking violation.
Was the stop limited to issuing a ticket and did not require criminal activity? Stop was an arrest-like detainment unrelated to criminal activity. Stop permissible when issuing a citation for a noncriminal traffic infraction. Yes; normal traffic-stop framework applied and did not require criminal activity.

Key Cases Cited

  • Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806 (1996) (probable cause to stop; legitimate traffic-stop framework)
  • Cresswell v. State, 564 So.2d 480 (Fla. 1990) (stop must last no longer than necessary to issue citation)
  • K.S. v. State, 85 So.3d 566 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (nonmoving traffic infraction includes non-criminal violations)
  • Reid v. State, 898 So.2d 248 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (no reasonable suspicion needed for valid initial stop)
  • D.A. v. State, 10 So.3d 674 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (driver’s license checks routinely accompany a traffic stop)
  • State v. Gross, 184 P.3d 978 (Kan. App. 2008) (officers may detain briefly to address traffic violation observed)
  • Braddy v. State, 111 So.3d 810 (Fla. 2012) (presumption of correctness in suppression rulings; de novo law application)
  • Gilbert v. State, 104 So.3d 1123 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (standard for reviewing trial court factual determinations)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Arevalo
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Mar 6, 2013
Citations: 112 So. 3d 529; 2013 WL 811586; 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3535; No. 4D11-3728
Docket Number: No. 4D11-3728
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In
    State v. Arevalo, 112 So. 3d 529