State v. Andrew Dallas Morgan, 153 Idaho 618

Morgan pled guilty to one count of grand theft; remaining burglary and grand theft charges were dismissed.
District court imposed a seven-year unified sentence with two years determinate, 120 days in Ada County jail, and seven years of probation.
In Aug. 2009 the State filed a probation-violation report listing multiple violations; Morgan admitted some violations on Nov. 29, 2009, and probation was revoked with retained jurisdiction on Jan. 14, 2010.
After retained jurisdiction, Morgan was placed back on probation until May 2011 when another violation report was filed; Morgan admitted more violations on May 23, 2011.
On July 22, 2011 the district court revoked probation and ordered execution of the original sentence; Morgan timely appealed and sought to augment the appellate record with transcripts from the first probation-violation hearings.

Issue	Plaintiff's Argument	Defendant's Argument	Held
Whether the denial of augmentation violated due process or equal protection	Morgan argues denial violated due process/equal protection	Morgan failed to show due process or equal protection was violated	No due process/equal protection violation"}]},{

State v. Strand, 137 Idaho 457, 50 P.3d 472 (2002) (due process requires sufficient record for appellate review of trial errors)
Draper v. Washington, 372 U.S. 487 (1963) (due process for appellate records includes necessary transcripts)
Lane v. Brown, 372 U.S. 477 (1963) (due process and access to appellate records)
Griffin v. Illinois, 351 U.S. 12 (1956) (indigency cannot bar access to appellate review in criminal cases)