History
  • No items yet
midpage
2018 Ohio 5067
Ohio Ct. App.
2018
Read the full case

Background

  • Robert L. Anderson II was indicted for second-degree felonious assault and third-degree felony domestic violence after an incident in 2017; jury convicted him of domestic violence and deadlocked on felonious assault.
  • At sentencing the state nolled the felonious assault count; court imposed 24 months for domestic violence plus a consecutive 12 months for violating post-release control (aggregate 36 months).
  • Anderson filed a motion seeking jail-time credit for pretrial confinement and appealed, arguing the prison sentence was unsupported and that the court failed to award jail-time credit.
  • The trial court noted Anderson’s probation/post-release-control status at the time of the offense and his extensive prior record, including five prior domestic-violence convictions and prior felony prison terms.
  • The sentencing entry listed specific jail confinement date ranges but the court did not calculate or expressly notify Anderson of the total days of credit at the sentencing hearing.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether prison term (vs. community control) was supported by the record State: sentence appropriate given offender’s record and failure of prior rehabilitation Anderson: should receive community control to obtain treatment; parties agreed treatment preferable Affirmed: record (priors, probation/PRC status, nature of offense) supports conclusion that community control was not appropriate
Whether trial court erred by failing to calculate/award jail-time credit State: conceded record insufficient as presented to determine exact credit without extra-record proof Anderson: trial court failed to determine/notify/include days of confinement as required by statute Reversed in part/remanded solely to determine proper jail-time credit (trial court failed to calculate/notify total days at sentencing)

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Marcum, 59 N.E.3d 1231 (Ohio 2016) (deferential review for sentences not requiring R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) findings)
  • State v. Mathis, 846 N.E.2d 1 (Ohio 2006) (trial courts have discretion to impose any prison term within statutory range without specific findings)
  • State v. Thompson, 59 N.E.3d 1264 (Ohio 2016) (determination of jail-time credit affects substantial liberty interest and must be addressed)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Anderson
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Dec 17, 2018
Citations: 2018 Ohio 5067; 2017-T-0116
Docket Number: 2017-T-0116
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In
    State v. Anderson, 2018 Ohio 5067