midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
2014 Ohio 4180
Ohio Ct. App.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • On July 16, 2012, Alsip drove left of center and caused a head-on collision that killed a motorist; he was indicted on two counts of aggravated vehicular homicide (second-degree felonies).
  • Alsip pleaded no contest to both counts; the court merged counts and on August 12, 2013 sentenced him to the maximum term for a second-degree felony (8 years) and lifetime license suspension.
  • Four days after sentencing Alsip filed a Crim.R. 32.1 motion to withdraw his no-contest plea, attaching an affidavit from his counsel (Ernst) stating the judge had told counsel off the record Alsip would not receive the minimum or maximum sentence if he pleaded.
  • The prosecutor (Gibson) submitted an affidavit saying the prosecutor immediately told the judge he would seek the maximum sentence and that the judge refused to commit to a sentence, saying only she normally did not impose maximum sentences on pleas but would consider everything.
  • The trial court denied the motion without an evidentiary hearing; Alsip appealed the denial and also argued the maximum sentence was improper because of his lack of prior record.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Alsip’s postsentence motion to withdraw plea should be granted because counsel promised he would not receive the maximum sentence State: Motion fails; defendant did not show substantial reliance on counsel’s alleged promise Alsip: Counsel promised no maximum sentence; that promise induced his plea so its breach is a manifest injustice Denied — no manifest injustice shown; Alsip offered no evidence he substantially relied on counsel’s statement, so no abuse of discretion in denying without hearing
Whether appellate court may review claim that maximum sentence was erroneous because Alsip lacked prior record State: N/A (procedural) Alsip: Sentence excessive given no criminal record Dismissed for lack of jurisdiction — Alsip failed to timely appeal the judgment of conviction within 30 days

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Smith, 49 Ohio St.2d 261, 361 N.E.2d 1324 (Ohio 1977) (standard: defendant must show "manifest injustice" to withdraw plea after sentencing)
  • State v. Blatnik, 17 Ohio App.3d 201, 478 N.E.2d 1016 (6th Dist. 1984) (statement that counsel’s promise of particular sentence does not automatically establish manifest injustice)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Alsip
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Sep 24, 2014
Citations: 2014 Ohio 4180; C-130699
Docket Number: C-130699
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In