State v. Adams
2019 Ohio 1140
Ohio Ct. App.2019Background
- On Sept. 9, 2017 police and medics found Kelly Lynne Adams unconscious in a backyard; she was revived from an apparent opioid overdose.
- On a nearby two-foot tree stump officers observed a pink-and-white purse containing items with Adams’s name, a mirror with white powder on it, two syringe caps and an empty syringe; BCI testing identified the powder as less than 0.10 grams of cocaine.
- Adams was charged with fifth-degree felony possession of cocaine; she pleaded not guilty and proceeded to jury trial.
- Officers testified drugs are typically kept near users, that multiple drugs may be used together, and that users often refuse to cooperate after overdose; no fingerprints, DNA, or testing of the syringe were performed.
- The jury convicted Adams; the trial court imposed jail time, continued community control, treatment, community service, and fees. Adams appealed on sufficiency, manifest weight, and ineffective-assistance grounds.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sufficiency of evidence to prove constructive possession | State: proximity of mirror with cocaine to Adams and her purse, setup for immediate use, and officer testimony supporting inference of dominion | Adams: mere proximity; no fingerprints/DNA; no crack pipe; someone else may have placed or removed items | Affirmed — circumstantial evidence (location of drugs, purse with her name, setup for use, lack of other persons) was sufficient to infer constructive possession |
| Manifest weight of evidence | State: testimony and physical evidence support jury’s credibility determinations | Adams: conflicting inferences (missing syringe, no pipe, incapacitated when found) show verdict against weight | Affirmed — no exceptional miscarriage of justice; jury did not clearly lose its way |
| Effectiveness of counsel re: 911 Good Samaritan immunity | State: counsel had no duty to advise because statute excludes those on community control | Adams: counsel failed to inform her she could avoid conviction by obtaining screening/referral under R.C. 2925.11(B)(2)(b) | Affirmed — Adams was on community control at time of overdose and thus not a "qualified individual;" counsel not deficient |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Jenks, 61 Ohio St.3d 259 (Ohio 1991) (standard for sufficiency of the evidence review)
- State v. Thompkins, 78 Ohio St.3d 380 (Ohio 1997) (manifest-weight standard and when reversal is warranted)
- State v. Teamer, 82 Ohio St.3d 490 (Ohio 1998) (trace amount of cocaine qualifies as a controlled substance)
- Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (U.S. 1984) (two-prong ineffective-assistance-of-counsel test)
