History
  • No items yet
midpage
763 S.E.2d 341
S.C.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • NCPD installed a GPS device on Adams' car without a warrant or authorization.
  • GPS data indicated Adams traveled to Atlanta; upon return, officers arranged a planned traffic stop with a drug canine.
  • The stop occurred near Charleston Southern University after Adams allegedly committed traffic violations.
  • A canine sniff and pat-down led to discovery of 141.62 grams of cocaine; Adams was charged with trafficking and related offenses.
  • Adams moved to suppress the seized drugs as fruits of an unlawful GPS installation and monitoring.
  • Court of Appeals held Fourth Amendment violation but affirmed suppression not warranted due to attenuating intervening acts; SC Supreme Court reversed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Intervening acts dissolve taint test applicable? Adams Adams Intervening acts doctrine rejected; taint not dissipated
Good-faith reliance on binding precedent can sustain warrantless GPS? State Adams Rejected; Knotts/Karo not binding; statute requires warrant
Jones effect on suppression for GPS tracking? State Adams Jones confirms search but cannot validate warrantless GPS here; suppression required

Key Cases Cited

  • Knotts v. United States, 460 U.S. 276 (U.S. 1983) (beeper surveillance; no expectation of privacy in moving vehicle)
  • Karo v. United States, 468 U.S. 705 (U.S. 1984) (beeper installation in third-party container; distinguishes GPS context)
  • Jones v. United States, 132 S. Ct. 945 (U.S. 2012) (GPS monitoring constitutes a search; trespass theory in focus)
  • Nelson v. State, 336 S.C. 186, 519 S.E.2d 786 (S.C. 1999) (attenuation analysis for intervening events; distinguishable facts)
  • United States v. Calandra, 414 U.S. 338 (U.S. 1974) (exclusionary rule deterrence; determines adoption of remedies)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Adams
Court Name: Supreme Court of South Carolina
Date Published: Sep 10, 2014
Citations: 763 S.E.2d 341; 409 S.C. 641; 2014 S.C. LEXIS 403; Appellate Case 2012-212779; 27445
Docket Number: Appellate Case 2012-212779; 27445
Court Abbreviation: S.C.
Log In