History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Abdulkadir
293 Neb. 560
| Neb. | 2016
Read the full case

Background

  • In June 2011, while an inmate, Mohamed Abdulkadir engaged in an altercation with fellow inmate Michael Grandon; Grandon was stabbed multiple times and later died (25 stab wounds).
  • Abdulkadir testified that Grandon struck him first and produced a knife; Abdulkadir wrestled the knife away and stabbed Grandon but could not recall all that followed. Another inmate, Danny Robinson, corroborated portions of Abdulkadir’s account.
  • Corrections officers testified that Grandon fell to the floor, curled into a fetal position, and Abdulkadir continued stabbing him multiple times while standing over him; one officer heard Abdulkadir yell, "You think you can steal from me?"
  • Abdulkadir was convicted of second degree murder and use of a deadly weapon; this court affirmed on direct appeal.
  • Abdulkadir filed a postconviction motion claiming ineffective assistance of trial counsel for failing to call two witnesses (Eltio Plater and a corrections officer "Vidal") who allegedly would have corroborated his self-defense claim; the district court denied an evidentiary hearing and relief.
  • The district court and this court concluded Abdulkadir’s proffered testimony from Plater amounted largely to the legal conclusion of self-defense or merely duplicated trial testimony and, even if credited, would not show prejudice because self-defense failed once Grandon was incapacitated.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether an evidentiary hearing on postconviction motion was required Abdulkadir: trial counsel was ineffective for not calling Plater and Vidal; their testimony would have supported self-defense and warranted a hearing State: motion lacks factual allegations of prejudice; alleged testimony is conclusory or cumulative Court: No hearing required — motion failed to allege sufficient prejudice
Whether counsel’s failure to call Plater was constitutionally deficient and prejudicial Abdulkadir: Plater would have testified that Grandon was aggressor, produced a knife, and Abdulkadir used it while defending himself State: Plater’s alleged testimony would only repeat facts already presented and would not make self-defense viable given the post-fall facts Court: Even assuming deficiency, Abdulkadir could not show prejudice because once Grandon fell the use of deadly force was unjustified
Whether "self-defense" assertions in a postconviction motion satisfy pleading requirements Abdulkadir: alleging Plater would corroborate self-defense State: conclusory legal assertion not a factual allegation Court: Legal conclusion cannot substitute for factual allegations; such pleading is insufficient
Whether prior representation on direct appeal waived postconviction ineffective-assistance claim Abdulkadir: raised claim in postconviction (first opportunity) State: same counsel represented on trial and appeal but postconviction is appropriate vehicle Court: Postconviction was the proper vehicle; claim not waived but still fails on merits

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Abdulkadir, 286 Neb. 417 (affirming convictions) (background and prior appeal)
  • State v. Banks, 289 Neb. 600 (2014) (postconviction claims that are only legal conclusions or lack factual specificity do not merit an evidentiary hearing)
  • State v. Phelps, 286 Neb. 89 (representation on trial and appeal by same counsel makes postconviction the usual first opportunity to raise trial counsel ineffectiveness)
  • State v. Cook, 290 Neb. 381 (standard for reviewing sufficiency of postconviction pleadings)
  • State v. Ware, 292 Neb. 24 (records and files may show movant is entitled to no relief)
  • State v. Jones, 274 Neb. 271 (ineffective-assistance prejudice and performance framework)
  • State v. McHenry, 268 Neb. 219 (postconviction as vehicle for ineffective-assistance claims when same counsel handled appeal)
  • State v. Golka, 281 Neb. 360 (self-defense instruction and legal standard)
  • State v. Miller, 281 Neb. 343 (reasonable belief standard for deadly-force self-defense)
  • State v. Smith, 284 Neb. 636 (continued use of deadly force not justified once threat is dispelled)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Abdulkadir
Court Name: Nebraska Supreme Court
Date Published: May 13, 2016
Citation: 293 Neb. 560
Docket Number: S-15-951
Court Abbreviation: Neb.