State v. Abdulkadir
293 Neb. 560
| Neb. | 2016Background
- In June 2011, while an inmate, Mohamed Abdulkadir engaged in an altercation with fellow inmate Michael Grandon; Grandon was stabbed multiple times and later died (25 stab wounds).
- Abdulkadir testified that Grandon struck him first and produced a knife; Abdulkadir wrestled the knife away and stabbed Grandon but could not recall all that followed. Another inmate, Danny Robinson, corroborated portions of Abdulkadir’s account.
- Corrections officers testified that Grandon fell to the floor, curled into a fetal position, and Abdulkadir continued stabbing him multiple times while standing over him; one officer heard Abdulkadir yell, "You think you can steal from me?"
- Abdulkadir was convicted of second degree murder and use of a deadly weapon; this court affirmed on direct appeal.
- Abdulkadir filed a postconviction motion claiming ineffective assistance of trial counsel for failing to call two witnesses (Eltio Plater and a corrections officer "Vidal") who allegedly would have corroborated his self-defense claim; the district court denied an evidentiary hearing and relief.
- The district court and this court concluded Abdulkadir’s proffered testimony from Plater amounted largely to the legal conclusion of self-defense or merely duplicated trial testimony and, even if credited, would not show prejudice because self-defense failed once Grandon was incapacitated.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether an evidentiary hearing on postconviction motion was required | Abdulkadir: trial counsel was ineffective for not calling Plater and Vidal; their testimony would have supported self-defense and warranted a hearing | State: motion lacks factual allegations of prejudice; alleged testimony is conclusory or cumulative | Court: No hearing required — motion failed to allege sufficient prejudice |
| Whether counsel’s failure to call Plater was constitutionally deficient and prejudicial | Abdulkadir: Plater would have testified that Grandon was aggressor, produced a knife, and Abdulkadir used it while defending himself | State: Plater’s alleged testimony would only repeat facts already presented and would not make self-defense viable given the post-fall facts | Court: Even assuming deficiency, Abdulkadir could not show prejudice because once Grandon fell the use of deadly force was unjustified |
| Whether "self-defense" assertions in a postconviction motion satisfy pleading requirements | Abdulkadir: alleging Plater would corroborate self-defense | State: conclusory legal assertion not a factual allegation | Court: Legal conclusion cannot substitute for factual allegations; such pleading is insufficient |
| Whether prior representation on direct appeal waived postconviction ineffective-assistance claim | Abdulkadir: raised claim in postconviction (first opportunity) | State: same counsel represented on trial and appeal but postconviction is appropriate vehicle | Court: Postconviction was the proper vehicle; claim not waived but still fails on merits |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Abdulkadir, 286 Neb. 417 (affirming convictions) (background and prior appeal)
- State v. Banks, 289 Neb. 600 (2014) (postconviction claims that are only legal conclusions or lack factual specificity do not merit an evidentiary hearing)
- State v. Phelps, 286 Neb. 89 (representation on trial and appeal by same counsel makes postconviction the usual first opportunity to raise trial counsel ineffectiveness)
- State v. Cook, 290 Neb. 381 (standard for reviewing sufficiency of postconviction pleadings)
- State v. Ware, 292 Neb. 24 (records and files may show movant is entitled to no relief)
- State v. Jones, 274 Neb. 271 (ineffective-assistance prejudice and performance framework)
- State v. McHenry, 268 Neb. 219 (postconviction as vehicle for ineffective-assistance claims when same counsel handled appeal)
- State v. Golka, 281 Neb. 360 (self-defense instruction and legal standard)
- State v. Miller, 281 Neb. 343 (reasonable belief standard for deadly-force self-defense)
- State v. Smith, 284 Neb. 636 (continued use of deadly force not justified once threat is dispelled)
