State v. Abbuhl
2011 Ohio 6550
Ohio Ct. App.2011Background
- Abbuhl, passenger in a car stopped by Newcomerstown police on Jan. 25, 2010, where odor of marijuana was detected.
- Driver granted consent to search; officer searched the vehicle and detected burned marijuana odor.
- Abbuhl was instructed to leave her purse in the car; officers searched the purse and found marijuana pre-rolled, baggies, and scales.
- Abbuhl was indicted for trafficking in drugs; suppression motion filed Sept. 29, 2010; suppression hearing held Oct. 25, 2010.
- Trial court denied suppression Jan. 25, 2011; Abbuhl pleaded no contest Jan. 31, 2011; convicted and sentenced March 16, 2011.
- Appellant challenges the purse search as unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment and Article I, Section 14.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the purse search violated the Fourth Amendment/Article I, Section 14 | Abbuhl | Abbuhl | Search upheld; probable cause to search vehicle included purse |
Key Cases Cited
- Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690 (1996) (probable cause/reasonable-suspicion standards reviewed de novo)
- State v. Moore, 90 Ohio St.3d 47 (2000) (odor of marijuana by qualified officer establishes probable cause)
- U.S. v. Ross, 456 U.S. 798 (1982) (vehicle search with probable cause may extend to entire vehicle)
- Wyoming v. Houghten, 526 U.S. 295 (1999) (passenger belongings in a vehicle may be inspected if capable of concealing evidence)
- State v. Mercier, 117 Ohio St.3d 1243 (2008) (specific Ohio reliance on purse/vehicle search under probable cause)
- State v. Latona, 2011-Ohio-1253 (2011) (odor of marijuana supports probable cause to search related vehicle)
- State v. Curry, 95 Ohio App.3d 93 (1994) (framework for reviewing suppression rulings)
- State v. Claytor, 85 Ohio App.3d 623 (1993) (analysis of suppression issues and standards)
- State v. Guysinger, 86 Ohio App.3d 592 (1993) (appellate review of suppression decision)
