History
  • No items yet
midpage
State of West Virginia v. Timothy Ray Sutherland
745 S.E.2d 448
W. Va.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Sutherland was convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to life without parole in Kanawha County.
  • The murder occurred in 2009; Sutherland argued with Stacie Smith, then fatally stabbed her and fled, taking items and writing a accusatory message on the wall.
  • Police arrested him December 30, 2009; he confessed to the killing after arrest.
  • Indicted in April 2010 for first-degree murder and robbery; trial in March 2011 resulted in murder conviction and acquittal on robbery.
  • Appellate challenge centered on whether a prospective juror should have been struck for cause; the court affirmed the conviction.
  • The decision also revisits State v. Phillips to assess automatic new-trial rights when a biased juror is removed by peremptory strike.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the trial court erred by not striking a juror for cause Sutherland Wong indicated bias and should be struck No reversible error; court preserved discretion to deny strike
Whether Phillips’ automatic new-trial remedy should apply when a biased juror is removed by peremptory strike Sutherland Phillips should allow automatic reversal Phillips overruled; prejudice required for new trial when peremptory strike cures bias
Impact of Newcomb and Juntilla on whether further voir dire was required Sutherland Defense failed to clarify bias Trial court did not abuse discretion; further inquiry not mandated given record

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Miller, 197 W.Va. 588 (1996) (test for juror bias and impartiality; three-step review)
  • State v. Mayle, 178 W.Va. 26, 357 S.E.2d 219 (1987) (standard for voir dire bias analysis)
  • State v. Newcomb, 223 W.Va. 843, 679 S.E.2d 675 (2009) (clear statement of bias automatic disqualification; further inquiry otherwise needed)
  • State v. Juntilla, 227 W.Va. 492, 711 S.E.2d 562 (2011) (limits of when further inquiry is required to establish bias)
  • State v. Phillips, 194 W.Va. 569, 461 S.E.2d 75 (1995) (automatic reversal for prejudice per syllabus point 8; overruled here)
  • Martinez-Salazar, 528 U.S. 304, 120 S. Ct. 774 (2000) (prejudice required when peremptory strike cures bias in federal cases)
  • Greer, 22 W.Va. 800 (1883) (conscientious scruples against death penalty; automatic disqualification in capital cases (amended by later law))
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State of West Virginia v. Timothy Ray Sutherland
Court Name: West Virginia Supreme Court
Date Published: Jun 5, 2013
Citation: 745 S.E.2d 448
Docket Number: 11-0799
Court Abbreviation: W. Va.