History
  • No items yet
midpage
State of West Virginia v. Brian Elisha Ballard
17-1008
| W. Va. | Oct 19, 2018
Read the full case

Background

  • Ballard was arrested April 20, 2017 on multiple charges including driving while revoked for DUI (third offense). He made an initial magistrate appearance the same day.
  • He executed a waiver of the preliminary hearing timeframe (within 20 days); a later rescheduled preliminary hearing was continued at defense counsel’s request citing that waiver/conflict. No preliminary hearing occurred before indictment.
  • A grand jury indicted Ballard July 18, 2017; the case was then transferred to circuit court.
  • On September 25, 2017 Ballard agreed to a plea deal: no contest to driving while revoked for DUI (third offense) in exchange for dismissal of the other charges. The court accepted the plea after advising Ballard of rights he would waive.
  • The circuit court sentenced Ballard to 1–3 years’ incarceration (to run concurrently with a Monroe County sentence) and memorialized the sentence September 26, 2017; Ballard appealed claiming denial of a preliminary hearing and judicial bias at sentencing.

Issues

Issue Ballard's Argument State's/Respondent's Argument Held
Was Ballard denied his right to a preliminary hearing? Ballard: he waived only the timeframe (not the hearing itself) and executed the timeframe waiver after the 20-day period expired. The State: a preliminary hearing is not constitutionally required, and indictment renders a preliminary hearing unnecessary; Ballard also waived pretrial defects by pleading no contest. Court: No error. Preliminary hearings are not constitutionally required and are unnecessary after indictment; plea waived any pretrial non-jurisdictional defects.
Was the sentencing judge biased, rendering sentence invalid? Ballard: judge was not unbiased (same judge had sentenced him in another matter; alleged officer testimony connections). The State: sentence is within statutory limits and Ballard points to no impermissible sentencing factor. Court: No merit. Sentence within statutory limits; unsupported bias allegation fails to identify any impermissible factor, so sentence stands.

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Adams, 211 W.Va. 231, 565 S.E.2d 353 (W. Va. 2002) (standard of review for sentencing—abuse of discretion unless statutory or constitutional violation)
  • State v. Goodnight, 169 W.Va. 366, 287 S.E.2d 504 (W. Va. 1982) (sentences within statutory limits and not based on impermissible factors are not subject to appellate review)
  • State ex rel. Rowe v. Ferguson, 165 W.Va. 183, 268 S.E.2d 45 (W. Va. 1980) (preliminary hearing is not constitutionally required)
  • State v. Davis, 236 W.Va. 550, 782 S.E.2d 423 (W. Va. 2016) (grand jury indictment supplies probable cause, making preliminary hearing unnecessary)
  • Call v. McKenzie, 159 W.Va. 191, 220 S.E.2d 665 (W. Va. 1975) (guilty plea waives pretrial and non-jurisdictional defects)
  • Humphries v. Detch, 227 W.Va. 627, 712 S.E.2d 795 (W. Va. 2011) (no contest plea has same consequences as guilty plea)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State of West Virginia v. Brian Elisha Ballard
Court Name: West Virginia Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 19, 2018
Docket Number: 17-1008
Court Abbreviation: W. Va.