History
  • No items yet
midpage
State of West Virginia v. Christopher Lane Rose
16-0601
| W. Va. | Sep 5, 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Christopher Lane Rose was indicted in Sept. 2015 on multiple sex‑related charges and related offenses; several charges later dismissed.
  • In March 2016 Rose entered a Kennedy plea, pleading no contest to three counts of first‑degree sexual abuse and one count of obtaining services by false pretense.
  • At plea hearing Rose acknowledged potential exposure to up to fifty years of supervised release.
  • At sentencing the State referenced past uncorroborated allegations; Rose objected to reliance on anonymous accusations.
  • The circuit court stated it would base sentence only on current case facts and explicitly disclaimed reliance on anonymous accusations.
  • Court imposed consecutive terms (1–5 years ×3 for abuse; 1–10 years for false pretense) plus fifty years of supervised release; Rose appealed only the supervised‑release term.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument (State) Defendant's Argument (Rose) Held
Whether the 50‑year supervised‑release term was improper because the court relied on uncorroborated past accusations Supervised release is statutorily authorized; circuit court said it relied only on present offense facts The sentence was tainted because the court considered anonymous, uncorroborated allegations of other victims Affirmed. Statute authorizes up to 50 years; record shows court did not base sentence on anonymous accusations, so no reversible error

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Head, 198 W.Va. 298, 480 S.E.2d 507 (W. Va. 1996) (standard of review for circuit court findings and legal questions)
  • State v. Georgius, 225 W.Va. 716, 696 S.E.2d 18 (W. Va. 2010) (applies three‑pronged review statement)
  • State v. Goodnight, 169 W.Va. 366, 287 S.E.2d 504 (W. Va. 1982) (sentences within statutory limits and not based on impermissible factors are not subject to appellate reversal)
  • State v. Booth, 224 W.Va. 307, 685 S.E.2d 701 (W. Va. 2009) (reiterating limits on appellate review of sentences)
  • Kennedy v. Frazier, 178 W.Va. 10, 357 S.E.2d 43 (W. Va. 1987) (Kennedy plea doctrine permitting no‑contest plea when defendant intelligently concludes plea is in his interest)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State of West Virginia v. Christopher Lane Rose
Court Name: West Virginia Supreme Court
Date Published: Sep 5, 2017
Docket Number: 16-0601
Court Abbreviation: W. Va.