State of West Virginia v. Patricia Ann Fields
16-0067
| W. Va. | Mar 13, 2017Background
- Patricia Ann Fields was convicted in 2011 of three counts of petit larceny (Kanawha County case 11-F-67) and placed on probation with restitution obligations.
- In 2012 Fields was indicted on 36 counts of unauthorized use of an access device (case 12-F-337); she ultimately pled guilty in March 2014 to one count of petit larceny as part of a plea that dismissed the 36-count indictment.
- The State moved to revoke Fields’s earlier probation (from the 2011 convictions) because she failed to make restitution payments.
- In June 2014 the circuit court sentenced Fields to consecutive one-year terms for each of the three 2011 petit larceny counts and one year for the 2014 petit larceny, and ordered restitution of $19,041; Fields did not appeal that sentence.
- In August 2015, after the appeal period had lapsed, Fields filed a Rule 35(b) motion to reduce sentence alleging ineffective assistance of counsel and prosecutorial misconduct; the circuit court denied the motion on October 26, 2015.
- Fields appealed the denial; the Supreme Court of Appeals affirmed, holding Rule 35(b) is limited to sentence reductions and cannot be used to relitigate conviction validity issues.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the circuit court erred by denying Fields’s Rule 35(b) motion to reduce sentence | Fields argued her sentence should be reduced because her conviction was tainted by ineffective assistance of counsel and prosecutorial misconduct | State argued Rule 35(b) is limited to sentence reduction and is not a vehicle to challenge the validity of a conviction | Denied — Rule 35(b) only concerns reduction of sentence; challenges to conviction (ineffective assistance, prosecutorial misconduct) are not cognizable on a Rule 35(b) motion |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Head, 198 W.Va. 298, 480 S.E.2d 507 (1996) (standard of review for Rule 35 motions and characterization of Rule 35(b) as plea for leniency)
- State v. Marcum, 238 W.Va. 26, 792 S.E.2d 37 (2016) (Rule 35(b) may not be used to challenge conviction validity)
