State Of Washington v. M.B., Jr.
48125-1
| Wash. Ct. App. | Nov 15, 2016Background
- 17-year-old M.B. lived with his mother and her boyfriend, Daniel Bowers; a house rule forbade girls in M.B.’s room.
- Around 4:30 a.m., Bowers found M.B. with a girl in his bedroom, used profane language, and woke M.B.’s mother; a heated verbal confrontation followed.
- Bowers approached chest-to-chest; M.B. struck Bowers twice in the head; Bowers left and called police; M.B. later told an officer he hit Bowers to defend himself.
- M.B. was charged with fourth-degree assault in juvenile court; he claimed self-defense at the adjudicatory hearing.
- The juvenile court excluded self-defense, finding M.B. lacked an objective fear of imminent injury and convicted him.
- The Court of Appeals reversed, holding the record contained sufficient evidence to let M.B. raise self-defense and that the exclusion prejudiced him.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether juvenile court erred in refusing to allow self-defense claim | State: M.B. lacked objective fear; evidence insufficient to raise self-defense | M.B.: testimony and circumstances supported subjective belief of imminent harm and that belief was objectively reasonable | Reversed: court erred; sufficient evidence existed to raise self-defense and exclusion was prejudicial |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Echeverria, 85 Wn. App. 777 (discussion of juvenile findings and written decision requirements)
- State v. Levy, 156 Wn.2d 709 (unchallenged findings are verities on appeal)
- State v. Mendez, 137 Wn.2d 208 (definition of substantial evidence)
- State v. Kintz, 169 Wn.2d 537 (respondent admits truth of State's evidence when challenging sufficiency)
- State v. Thomas, 150 Wn.2d 821 (deference to trier of fact on credibility)
- State v. Tyler, 138 Wn. App. 120 (elements of fourth-degree assault)
- State v. McCullum, 98 Wn.2d 484 (self-defense as affirmative defense; burden shifting)
- State v. Graves, 97 Wn. App. 55 (some evidence from any source suffices to raise self-defense; subjective and objective elements)
- State v. Summers, 120 Wn.2d 801 (same rule that minimal evidence raises self-defense issue)
- State v. Walden, 131 Wn.2d 469 (self-defense requires subjective belief and objective reasonableness)
- State v. Read, 147 Wn.2d 238 (standard of review depends on basis for refusing to consider self-defense)
- State v. B.J.S., 140 Wn. App. 91 (findings must support conclusions of law)
- State v. Werner, 170 Wn.2d 333 (excluding a supported defense is reversible when prejudicial)
