State of Washington v. Edward Leon Nelson
37093-3
| Wash. Ct. App. | Jul 1, 2021Background:
- Edward Nelson was convicted of first-degree robbery and sentenced in 2016 to life without parole; the judgment imposed mandatory LFOs including a $500 crime victim penalty and a $100 DNA collection fee, plus interest; the court found Nelson indigent and waived discretionary fees.
- At sentencing the judgment stated all financial obligations "shall bear interest" at the civil-judgment rate.
- In 2018 the Legislature amended LFO statutes; the DNA-fee statute was revised to bar duplicate collection when DNA had already been collected for a prior conviction, and Ramirez held the 2018 amendments apply prospectively to cases pending on direct appeal.
- Nelson filed a CrR 7.8 motion in 2019 arguing the DNA fee was now void as a duplicate; the State conceded and the trial court entered an agreed order striking the DNA fee without a recorded hearing.
- Nelson appealed, arguing he had a right to be present and to counsel when the agreed order was entered; he also, for the first time on appeal, argued interest on non-restitution LFOs must be waived under the 2018 amendments.
- The Court of Appeals affirmed removal of the DNA fee (finding the correction ministerial/clerical and not a critical stage) and remanded to strike interest on non-restitution LFOs per the 2018 amendments.
Issues:
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether entry of an agreed order striking the DNA fee violated Nelson's right to be present and to counsel | Nelson: he had a due-process right to be present and a right to counsel at resentencing/when J&S was altered | State: removal was ministerial/clerical (void fee), unopposed, so no critical stage triggering presence or counsel | Court: no right to be present or to counsel for the ministerial/clerical correction; entry of agreed order was proper (harmless if any counsel error) |
| Whether interest on non-restitution LFOs must be waived/struck | Nelson: interest provision must be struck under the 2018 LFO amendments and Ramirez | State: did not contest this issue on appeal | Court: remand to strike/waive all interest on non-restitution LFOs accrued before June 7, 2018 and to stop future accrual as provided by the 2018 amendments |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Ramirez, 191 Wn.2d 732 (Wash. 2018) (2018 LFO amendments apply prospectively to cases pending on direct appeal)
- State v. Catling, 193 Wn.2d 252 (Wash. 2019) (DNA collection fee is mandatory unless DNA previously collected)
- State v. Klump, 80 Wn. App. 391 (Wash. Ct. App. 1996) (trial court may correct clerical errors in a judgment and sentence)
- State v. Hardesty, 129 Wn.2d 303 (Wash. 1996) (CrR 7.8 permits amendment of a judgment to correct an erroneous sentence)
- State v. Heddrick, 166 Wn.2d 898 (Wash. 2009) (Sixth Amendment right to counsel applies at critical stages)
- State v. Robinson, 153 Wn.2d 689 (Wash. 2005) (appointment of counsel for CrR 7.8-like proceedings is governed by harmless-error review)
- In re Pers. Restraint of Lord, 123 Wn.2d 296 (Wash. 1994) (core right to be present when evidence is presented)
