State Of Washington v. Donald J. Legrone
74526-3
Wash. Ct. App.Jun 12, 2017Background
- On Oct. 23, 2013, Donald Legrone and Charles Rodriguez entered a motel room through a window; Rodriguez assaulted the occupant (Lensegrav) and Legrone prevented the client (Smith) from leaving and chased/assaulted him.
- After forcibly removing Lensegrav from the motel, Rodriguez and Legrone drove her to a rural area where both assaulted and threatened her; Legrone also forced sexual acts and threatened her family.
- Lensegrav later sought medical treatment and was diagnosed with a fractured cheekbone; police charged Legrone with first degree burglary, first degree kidnapping, and second degree assault (jury convicted him of first degree burglary and fourth degree assault; deadlocked on kidnapping).
- Legrone appealed, arguing the jury verdict violated his right to a unanimous jury because the State charged alternative means of burglary and the jury was not instructed it must be unanimous as to means; he also challenged a domestic violence designation on the misdemeanor assault conviction and raised various other claims in a statement of additional grounds.
- The State conceded the domestic violence designation on the fourth degree assault was improper; the court reviewed sufficiency of evidence on the burglary count and other ancillary claims.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the jury must be unanimous as to the alternative means of first degree burglary | State: unanimity as to means not required if substantial evidence supports each alternative means | Legrone: jury unanimity required as to the means; trial court erred by not so instructing | Court: unanimity as to means not required here because substantial evidence supported each charged means; conviction upheld |
| Whether sufficient evidence showed Legrone had intent to commit a crime (as principal or accomplice) when entering | State: evidence (texts, coordinated entry, actions during attack) supports accomplice liability and intent | Legrone: disputed that State proved intent to commit a crime at entry | Court: sufficient evidence that Legrone was ready to assist Rodriguez and entered with intent; burglary conviction supported |
| Whether fourth degree assault judgment improperly included a domestic violence designation | State: designation conceded improper because no qualifying relationship shown | Legrone: designation erroneous | Court: agree with State; remand to delete domestic violence designation |
| Whether appellate costs should be awarded given Legrone's indigency finding | State: may seek appellate costs unless indigency no longer applies | Legrone: asks court to deny appellate costs due to indigency | Court: trial court found indigent; award of costs may only proceed if State shows significant financial improvement and moves the commissioner |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Ortega-Martinez, 124 Wn.2d 702 (discusses unanimity requirements for alternative means)
- State v. Salinas, 119 Wn.2d 192 (principles on appellate sufficiency review)
- State v. Luna, 71 Wn. App. 755 (accomplice liability requires readiness to assist)
- State v. Allen, 127 Wn. App. 125 (statutory elements of burglary/related analysis)
