State of Tennessee v. Melvin King
E2016-01043-CCA-R3-CD
| Tenn. Crim. App. | May 22, 2017Background
- On June 26, 2014, Melvin King and several codefendants entered a Knoxville home during an attempted robbery/robbery of suspected drug sellers; during the incident the homeowner, John Huddleston, was shot multiple times and died; two dogs were shot and a house occupant (Sydney Smith) was wounded.
- King drove to the house, participated in the armed entry (wore a face covering), threatened residents (pointed a .40 caliber handgun at victims, demanded drugs/money), and was identified at trial by victims and codefendants; shell casings at the scene matched a .40 handgun found nearby.
- Several codefendants pled guilty and some testified for the State; King made inculpatory jailhouse statements to another inmate admitting multiple gunshots were fired.
- A Knox County jury convicted King of multiple counts including first-degree murder, aggravated burglary, employing a firearm during a dangerous felony, three counts of especially aggravated kidnapping, attempted especially aggravated robbery counts, reckless aggravated assault, and aggravated animal cruelty; he received an effective life sentence.
- King appealed, challenging (1) sufficiency of evidence for dual kidnapping/attempted robbery convictions, (2) admission of autopsy photographs, and (3) the flight jury instruction. The Court affirmed but remanded for entry of missing judgment forms.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sufficiency of evidence for especially aggravated kidnapping & attempted especially aggravated robbery | State: evidence (witness IDs, guns, threats, victims confined/removed) supports convictions | King: kidnappings were incidental to robbery; no robbery of some victims; White requires greater confinement than necessary | Affirmed: victims of kidnapping were different from robbery victims; under Teats/Williams due-process concern not present; evidence supports convictions |
| Admission of autopsy photographs | State: photos relevant to show number/trajectory of gunshot wounds; aid jury understanding | King: cause of death not disputed; photos more prejudicial than probative | Affirmed: trial court did not abuse discretion under Tenn. R. Evid. 401/403 and Banks factors; photos informative, not unduly prejudicial |
| Flight jury instruction | State: evidence of leaving the scene supported instruction | King: left scene but did not hide from police or attempt to evade capture | Affirmed: flight instruction proper where defendants fled scene; return to scene irrelevant |
| Procedural defect: judgment forms missing | State: not disputed | King: raised on appeal | Remanded: trial court must enter separate judgment forms for listed counts |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. White, 362 S.W.3d 559 (Tenn. 2012) (White instruction: removal/confinement must be greater than that necessary to commit accompanying felony)
- State v. Teats, 468 S.W.3d 495 (Tenn. 2015) (White instruction not required when kidnapping and robbery involve different victims)
- State v. Williams, 468 S.W.3d 510 (Tenn. 2015) (same principle: kidnapping of one victim cannot be incidental to offense against a different victim)
- State v. Alston, 465 S.W.3d 555 (Tenn. 2015) (aggravated burglary with kidnapping, standing alone, does not always warrant White instruction)
- Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (1979) (standard for sufficiency review: any rational trier of fact could find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt)
- State v. Banks, 564 S.W.2d 947 (Tenn. 1978) (framework for admissibility of graphic photographs under Rule 403)
- State v. Davidson, 509 S.W.3d 156 (Tenn. 2016) (trial court must enter separate judgment forms for each count)
