State of Tennessee v. Christopher Lee Davis
354 S.W.3d 718
| Tenn. | 2011Background
- June 12, 2007, McDaniel was carjacked at a Hartsville carwash by two masked men, including Davis, who demanded money and controlled the ATM withdrawal.
- After the robbery, the suspects left in McDaniel's Monte Carlo; the car was later found with valuable parts intact and police generated a BOLO describing the suspects and vehicle.
- Investigators observed a white Crown Victoria with two African-American males at the boat dock area near the Monte Carlo and detected evasive behavior when they saw law enforcement.
- Detective Tarlecky stopped the Crown Victoria at the boat dock; James Phillips admitted to driving, and Davis was identified as a passenger; consent searches followed revealing relevant items.
- Searches at a Winwood Drive residence yielded additional corroborating items (stolen stereo, a gun, duct tape, bandanas, a red hat) linking to the carjacking.
- Defendant Davis was convicted of aggravated robbery, carjacking, attempt to commit especially aggravated kidnapping, and attempt to commit first degree murder; sentence totaled 49 years with a mix of concurrent and consecutive terms; case remanded for consecutive-sentencing determination.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the stop at the boat dock was valid. | State | Davis | Stop valid; reasonable suspicion supported |
| Whether evidence supports attempt to commit first degree murder. | State | Davis | Evidence sufficient for substantial step and premeditation |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Day, 263 S.W.3d 891 (Tenn. 2008) (reasonable suspicion and tery framework; mixed questions of law and fact)
- State v. Binette, 33 S.W.3d 215 (Tenn. 2000) (reasonable suspicion standards; articulable facts)
- State v. Williams, 185 S.W.3d 311 (Tenn. 2006) (reasonable suspicion standard; premeditation inference allowed)
- State v. Reeves, 916 S.W.2d 909 (Tenn. 1996) (substantial step concept in attempted murder)
- State v. Suttles, 30 S.W.3d 252 (Tenn. 2000) (premeditation factors; circumstantial evidence of intent)
