STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. FIRICIN AUGUSTIN STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. GREGORY TORRES (15-06-0468, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (CONSOLIDATED)
A-5864-17/A-2506-18
| N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. | Oct 26, 2021Background
- Dec. 12, 2014 shooting at Pierce Manor (Elizabeth, NJ) left Bilal Fullman dead; shell casings and bullets (.25 and .38/9mm) recovered and security video showed three people running from the building.
- Victim’s acquaintances placed several men in the lobby/hallway that evening: Brockington saw an argument and observed Augustin with a handgun; Tyrone Dozier later told police he saw Torres, Augustin, and Mosby shooting Fullman.
- Jumani Terrell and Michael Luciano gave prior statements implicating Torres (Terrell to police; Luciano that Torres confessed to him). Terrell recanted in-court but prior recorded statements were admitted.
- Trial (Feb–Apr 2018) tried defendants Torres, Augustin, and Mosby together: jury convicted Torres of murder and weapons offenses, convicted Augustin of unlawful possession of a weapon, acquitted Mosby.
- Trial court denied mistrial motion after a witness blurted that defendants "sell drugs out there," denied motions for acquittal/new trial, and imposed prison terms; appellate division affirmed convictions but remanded for reconsideration of imposition of consecutive sentences.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Motion for mistrial after witness said defendants "sell drugs" at building | State: remark was inadvertent, prosecutor did not elicit it, curative instruction cures any prejudice | Defendants: comment impermissibly suggested other bad acts and was highly prejudicial requiring mistrial | Court: denial of mistrial not an abuse of discretion; witness' remark struck and a strong curative instruction given, which was adequate (Winter/Harvey standard) |
| Sufficiency of evidence / motions for acquittal or new trial | State: multiple witnesses placed defendants at scene; Dozier, Terrell, Luciano, physical evidence and video permit reasonable inferences of guilt | Defendants: key witnesses inconsistent/unreliable; lack of physical corroboration (no gun produced, ballistics not matching Brockington's .40 description); Luciano confession uncorroborated | Court: applied Jackson/Kluber standard, gave State favorable inferences, found evidence sufficient to let a reasonable jury convict; motions denied |
| Failure to charge lesser-included offenses and self-defense sua sponte | State: (requested aggravated manslaughter instruction) | Torres: trial judge should have instructed on aggravated manslaughter, manslaughter, passion-provocation manslaughter, and self-defense | Court: no plain error—record did not "jump off the page" to clearly indicate lesser-included or self-defense charges; defendant had declined such instructions and evidence did not warrant sua sponte charge (Carrero/Alexander standards) |
| Admissibility of Terrell's prior statements (Gross factors) | State: prior recorded inconsistent statements admissible under N.J.R.E. 803(a) and Gross reliability factors | Defendants: statements unreliable and coerced; should have been excluded | Court: trial judge applied Gross factors, found statements sufficiently reliable by preponderance, instructed jury on Gross factors; no abuse of discretion |
| Sentencing: imposition of consecutive terms to previously imposed sentences | State: consecutive terms permissible; judge determined consecutive sentence appropriate | Defendants: judge failed to state Yarbough factors and explain reasons for running sentences consecutively | Held: convictions affirmed, but remanded for the sentencing judge to reconsider and make explicit Yarbough findings addressing consecutive-term decision |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Harvey, 151 N.J. 117 (1997) (trial judge's discretion on mistrial decisions)
- State v. Winter, 96 N.J. 640 (1984) (adequacy of curative instruction to cure prejudicial testimony)
- State v. Gross, 121 N.J. 1 (1990) (fifteen-factor reliability inquiry for admitting prior inconsistent statements)
- Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (1979) (standard for sufficiency review: evidence viewed in light most favorable to prosecution)
- State v. Kluber, 130 N.J. Super. 336 (App. Div. 1974) (Rule 3:18-1 acquittal standard and giving State favorable inferences)
- State v. Rose, 112 N.J. 454 (1988) (no rational basis for lesser-included manslaughter where defendant fired at close range)
- State v. Bunch, 180 N.J. 534 (2004) (conviction for unlawful possession may rest on eyewitness testimony without producing the weapon)
- State v. Yarbough, 100 N.J. 627 (1985) (factors required and need for articulated reasons when imposing consecutive sentences)
- Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460 (2012) (juvenile sentencing considerations)
- Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005) (distinguishing juvenile characteristics at sentencing)
- State v. Zuber, 227 N.J. 422 (2017) (applying Miller factors for juvenile offenders at sentencing)
