STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. GARY GUIONSÂ (99-08-2813, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
A-3537-15T2
| N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. | Oct 26, 2017Background
- Defendant Gary Guions committed two murders at age 16, was waived to adult court, and pled guilty.
- In 2000 the court sentenced him to concurrent 40-year terms with 34 years parole ineligibility.
- Appellate and PCR challenges were previously denied; this appeal follows denial of a motion to correct an "illegal sentence."
- Defendant argued his sentence is a de facto life-without-parole for a juvenile and violates the Eighth Amendment under Miller and related juveniles-are-different jurisprudence.
- Trial court (Judge Petrolle) denied relief; the Appellate Division affirmed, concluding the sentence did not run afoul of the Eighth Amendment and Miller.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether defendant's sentence is an unconstitutional juvenile life-without-parole equivalent | State: sentence lawful; Miller prohibits mandatory LWOP for juveniles but does not bar discretionary lengthy sentences if court considers youth | Guions: 40-year term with 34-year parole ineligibility is a de facto LWOP for a juvenile; sentencing court failed to meaningfully consider youth factors required by Miller | Affirmed: sentence not the mandatory LWOP Miller prohibits; court considered age and Miller does not forbid lengthy discretionary sentences |
| Whether an evidentiary hearing was required on the motion to correct sentence | State: record and prior proceedings sufficient; no new factual inquiry warranted | Guions: entitlement to hearing to develop youth-related mitigation and show illegality of sentence | Held: no evidentiary hearing required; motion lacked sufficient merit |
Key Cases Cited
- Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (recognizes Eighth Amendment limits on juvenile capital punishment and that juveniles are constitutionally different)
- Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460 (holds mandatory life-without-parole for offenders under eighteen is unconstitutional and requires sentencing courts to consider youth-related mitigating factors)
