STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. P.M.B.(10-04-0183, SALEM COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)(RECORD IMPOUNDED)
A-0273-15T2
| N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. | Sep 27, 2017Background
- Defendant P.M.B. pled guilty to first-degree aggravated sexual assault for anally penetrating his stepson who was under 13; sentenced to seven years with an 85% parole ineligibility under the No Early Release Act.
- Defendant filed a pro se PCR petition alleging numerous trial errors and ineffective assistance of counsel (IAC); PCR counsel was appointed and a plenary hearing was held.
- At the PCR hearing both defendant and trial counsel testified; the trial judge (who had accepted the plea and imposed sentence) found counsel more credible than defendant.
- Key factual disputes: whether counsel adequately reviewed discovery and investigated/witnessed the case; whether counsel pressured defendant to plead; whether counsel misadvised about eligibility for Avenel treatment and about post-conviction parenting/visitation consequences.
- The PCR court found counsel reviewed discovery with defendant, correctly advised on sentencing exposure, explained limits on contact with children, and that the State had a strong case; the court also found no prejudice from any alleged lapses and denied relief.
- Defendant appealed; the Appellate Division affirmed, holding defendant failed to meet Strickland/Fritz standards for IAC and that many pro se claims were procedurally barred or waived by the guilty plea.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ineffective assistance: inadequate investigation | Counsel investigated adequately and reviewed discovery with defendant | Counsel failed to interview victim/mother and did not investigate potential witnesses | Court: Counsel credible; performance not deficient; no relief granted |
| Voluntariness of plea (IAC during plea bargaining) | Plea was knowing/voluntary; record and plea colloquy confirm defendant understood consequences | Counsel pressured defendant into pleading; inaccurate sentencing advice affected decision | Court: No reasonable probability defendant would have gone to trial; plea upheld |
| Sentencing/Avenel treatment advice | Counsel validly weighed mitigation/aggravation; sentence reflected court’s independent judgment | Counsel misadvised that Avenel required custodial sentence ≥7 years, possibly affecting plea/sentence | Court: State concedes statutory error but defendant showed no prejudice; sentence would stand |
| Parenting/visitation post-conviction | Counsel informed defendant of statute and limitations; defendant received Sex Offense Restraining Order | Counsel failed to advise about ability to have parenting time with daughter after sentence | Court: Defendant was informed via statute and restraining order; no ignorance; claim fails |
Key Cases Cited
- Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (Ineffective assistance two-prong standard)
- State v. Fritz, 105 N.J. 42 (New Jersey adoption of Strickland standard)
- State v. Gaitan, 209 N.J. 339 (IAC standard applied to plea bargaining; prejudice requires reasonable probability defendant would have gone to trial)
- State v. Pierre, 223 N.J. 560 (deference to PCR court factual findings)
- State v. Webster, 187 N.J. 254 (remand where PCR counsel and court fail to address pro se claims)
