STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. SANDRA NOLLEYÂ (A-34-15, CAMDEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
A-3984-15T1
| N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. | Jul 14, 2017Background
- Sandra Nolley was charged and convicted of obstruction of the administration of law, N.J.S.A. 2C:29-1, following an incident in an apartment on May 23, 2015.
- Police responded to a call from Chris VanSciver asking officers to remove an "unwanted female."
- Officer Olivieri entered the apartment, told Nolley Chris did not want her there, and asked her to leave and to provide identification.
- Nolley refused to provide ID, cited the slogan "Hands up. Don't shoot," and refused to leave; she was arrested for obstruction.
- Municipal court convicted Nolley; on de novo Law Division review the judge also convicted her but reduced the fine.
- On appeal, this court reversed, holding the record did not show conduct meeting the statute's required means (flight, intimidation, force, violence, physical interference) or an independently unlawful act such as trespass.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether Nolley violated N.J.S.A. 2C:29-1 by refusing to leave or provide ID | Refusal to leave when ordered by police constitutes physical interference under the statute | Mere refusal to provide ID or leave (when seemingly lawfully on the premises) is not a crime and does not amount to obstruction | Reversed — conduct did not satisfy statute: no physical interference as defined, nor an independently unlawful act |
Key Cases Cited
- Reece, 222 N.J. 154 (review standard — appellate deference to trial findings)
- Powers, 448 N.J. Super. 69 (statute not to be loosely interpreted; must show statutory means)
- Johnson, 42 N.J. 146 (appellate review principles)
- Kuropchak, 221 N.J. 368 (scope of appellate review)
- Barone, 147 N.J. 599 (deference to credibility findings)
- Cerefice, 335 N.J. Super. 374 (deference to municipal credibility findings)
- Mann, 203 N.J. 328 (no deference on pure legal questions)
- Camillo, 382 N.J. Super. 113 (obstruction requires violent/physical interference or an independently unlawful act)
- Hernandez, 338 N.J. Super. 317 (distinguishing refusal to leave during an arrest from refusal to leave otherwise)
