STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. SELWIN O. BASCOMÂ (11-05-0993, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
A-3231-15T2
| N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. | Jul 6, 2017Background
- Police stopped defendant after observing dangerous driving and a passenger throwing something from a vehicle; officers smelled marijuana and later found 11 small bags of marijuana on defendant and 49 grams of cocaine in the patrol car.
- On May 25, 2011, Bascom pled guilty to fourth-degree possession of marijuana with intent to distribute pursuant to a plea agreement recommending two years' probation.
- At the plea hearing and on the signed plea form, Bascom indicated he was a U.S. citizen; the plea form expressly warned that noncitizens may be deported as a consequence of a guilty plea.
- Bascom’s presentence report listed Guyana as his birthplace but also indicated he was a U.S. citizen; he was sentenced July 15, 2011, and did not appeal.
- In August 2014 Bascom filed a pro se PCR petition alleging he had told plea counsel he was not a U.S. citizen and that counsel failed to advise him of immigration consequences or correct the court record; he had by then been deported to Guyana.
- The PCR court denied relief, finding Bascom’s sworn, post hoc assertions contradicted by the plea colloquy and plea form and therefore insufficient to establish a prima facie claim of ineffective assistance; this appeal followed.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument (State) | Defendant's Argument (Bascom) | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether Bascom made a prima facie showing entitling him to an evidentiary hearing on ineffective assistance regarding immigration advice | The record (plea colloquy and plea form) shows Bascom represented he was a U.S. citizen; his bare, later assertion is insufficient to require a hearing | He swears he told plea counsel he was not a citizen and counsel failed to advise him or correct the court when he mistakenly said he was a citizen | Denied — the court found the record contradicts Bascom’s later assertion and bald allegations do not warrant a hearing |
| Whether counsel was ineffective for failing to advise about immigration consequences or correct the court record | Counsel cannot be faulted when the defendant affirmatively represented citizenship to the court and on the plea form; counsel had no basis to warn about or prevent immigration consequences | Counsel was ineffective because he failed to inform Bascom of deportation risk and failed to correct Bascom’s misstatement that he was a citizen | Denied — where defendant affirmatively misrepresented citizenship at plea, counsel’s alleged failure to advise does not constitute ineffective assistance on this record |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Nuñez-Valdéz, 200 N.J. 129 (2009) (affirmatively misleading immigration advice can establish ineffective assistance)
- State v. Jones, 219 N.J. 298 (2014) (bald assertions insufficient to obtain evidentiary hearing in PCR)
- State v. DiFrisco, 137 N.J. 434 (1994) (standards for ineffective assistance claims)
- State v. Fritz, 105 N.J. 42 (1987) (ineffective assistance legal framework)
