History
  • No items yet
midpage
State of New Jersey v. Daniel Johnson
A-3088-22
| N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. | Feb 18, 2025
Read the full case

Background

  • Daniel Johnson was indicted in 2014 in Hudson and Passaic Counties on charges including felony murder, armed robbery, and weapons offenses.
  • The Passaic and Hudson County indictments were consolidated for trial in Passaic County.
  • Johnson was convicted by jury on two Hudson County counts (second-degree robbery and conspiracy) but acquitted on all Passaic County charges and other Hudson charges.
  • His direct appeal challenged the admissibility of a show-up identification by the victim (G.W.), but this conviction was affirmed by the Appellate Division, and the NJ Supreme Court denied certification.
  • Johnson then filed a pro se post-conviction relief (PCR) petition, arguing ineffective assistance of counsel. The PCR court denied relief without an evidentiary hearing, and Johnson appealed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether counsel was ineffective in cross-examining G.W. Counsel adequately cross-examined, pointed out inconsistencies Counsel should have recalled and more vigorously cross-examined G.W. on the show-up identification No deficiency or prejudice; prior issue already resolved
Whether counsel failed to investigate exculpatory witness No admissible testimony was available; counsel was not deficient Failure to call paralegal A.N. (re: co-defendant’s affidavit) was ineffective assistance No deficiency/prejudice; testimony would be hearsay/inadmissible
Entitlement to evidentiary hearing on PCR No prima facie case shown; record sufficient Prima facie claim shown so evidentiary hearing was warranted No hearing required; record does not support PCR claims
Use of PCR to re-litigate direct appeal issues Not permitted under NJ procedural rules Issues were reframed as ineffective assistance, not previously addressed Procedurally barred; claims already addressed on direct appeal

Key Cases Cited

  • Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984) (establishes the two-prong test for ineffective assistance of counsel)
  • State v. Fritz, 105 N.J. 42 (1987) (adopts Strickland standard for New Jersey)
  • State v. Henderson, 208 N.J. 208 (2011) (factors for assessing reliability of eyewitness identification)
  • State v. Harris, 181 N.J. 391 (2004) (standard for reviewing denial of post-conviction relief)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State of New Jersey v. Daniel Johnson
Court Name: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Date Published: Feb 18, 2025
Docket Number: A-3088-22
Court Abbreviation: N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.