State of Missouri v. Nanette Sue Litherland
477 S.W.3d 156
| Mo. Ct. App. | 2015Background
- Nanette S. Litherland appeals after a jury convicted her of first-degree assault and first-degree murder, with reversible error asserted on denied continuance.
- The offenses related to shootings at the Litherland family farm: James Litherland shot on Sept 22, 2009; Jerry Litherland killed on Nov 8, 2009.
- Defendant’s sole defense witness, M.L., was pregnant and went into labor the morning of trial, creating temporary unavailability.
- Defense sought a one-week continuance; the State opposed; the court denied the motion and proceeded to trial without live testimony from M.L.
- Rule 25.13 would allow deposition testimony if witness is unavailable, but the court’s denial raised issues about using a deposition given M.L.’s anticipated live testimony.
- The appellate court held the denial of the continuance was an abuse of discretion, prejudicial to Litherland, and remanded for a new trial.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether denial of a continuance for a temporarily unavailable sole defense witness was reversible error | Litherland contends denial abused discretion and prejudiced defense | State argues no abuse; trial proceeding despite unavailability was permissible | Abuse of discretion; prejudicial; remand for new trial |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Salter, 250 S.W.3d 705 (Mo. banc 2008) (continuance standards and prejudice considerations)
- State v. Blocker, 133 S.W.3d 502 (Mo. banc 2004) (witness unavailability and right to defense)
- State v. Morin, 873 S.W.2d 858 (Mo. App. S.D. 1994) (prejudice where defense witness unavailable)
- State v. Simonton, 49 S.W.3d 766 (Mo. App. W.D. 2001) (due process and right to present witnesses in defense)
- State v. Blocker, 133 S.W.3d 502 (Mo. banc 2004) (reiterated analysis of continuance due to key witness)
- McBurney v. Cameron, 248 S.W.3d 36 (Mo. App. W.D. 2008) (deposition vs. live testimony credibility considerations)
- State v. Wilson, 732 S.W.2d 186 (Mo. App. W.D. 1987) (prejudice from absence of vital witness)
- State v. Salter, 250 S.W.3d 705 (Mo. banc 2008) (discretionary standard for continuances)
