State of Missouri v. Daniel Dumond Brown, Sr.
444 S.W.3d 484
Mo. Ct. App.2014Background
- Brown was convicted by a Clay County jury of two counts of first-degree robbery under §569.020 and two counts of armed criminal action under §571.015; sentences were 25 years on each count with Count II consecutive to Count I and Counts III and IV concurrent to Count II.
- Brown appealed alleging (1) plain error in denying a continuance to prepare to represent himself and (2) abuse of discretion in denying a mistrial after an officer referenced an uncharged prior robbery.
- In June 2011, Brown employed his former girlfriend Scofield to drive him to a Pizza Hut; he confronted the closing manager, demanded cash, and left on foot with money observed later in Scofield’s garage.
- In July 2011, Brown and Scofield robbed an Arby’s in Liberty; police stopped their Suburban the same night, discovering cash and a handgun; Monk identified Brown as the Arby’s robber.
- A pretrial in limine prohibited evidence of unrelated criminal offenses; during trial Officer Loy referenced a recent Pizza Hut robbery in our city, prompting an objection and a curative instruction.
- The trial court denied the mistrial request; the court held the overall evidence overwhelming and the curative instruction mitigated any prejudice.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Continuance to self-represent | Brown argues denial was plain error and violated self-representation rights. | Brown contends the court failed to properly consider preparing to represent himself. | No plain error; discretion to deny continuance not abused. |
| Mistrial for uncharged crime reference | Officer Loy’s remark violated the motion in limine and warranted a mistrial. | The reference was inadvertent and not highly prejudicial. | No abuse of discretion; curative instruction and lack of decisive prejudice. |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Wright, 383 S.W.3d 1 (Mo. App. W.D. 2012) (five-factor test for prejudice from prior crimes evidence)
- State v. Goff, 129 S.W.3d 857 (Mo. banc 2004) (five-factor framework for prejudice of improper testimony)
- State v. Smith, 934 S.W.2d 318 (Mo. App. W.D. 1996) (propriety of determining bad-faith or innocuous reference to prior crimes)
- State v. Gilbert, 636 S.W.2d 940 (Mo. banc 1982) (inadmissible evidence reference may be non-imputed to defendant)
- State v. Witte, 37 S.W.3d 378 (Mo. App. S.D. 1999) (isolated reference not tying to defendant)
- State v. Edwards, 365 S.W.3d 240 (Mo. App. W.D. 2012) (preservation and plain-error standards for continuance)
- State v. Powell, 318 S.W.3d 297 (Mo. App. W.D. 2010) (mistrial denial reviewed for abuse of discretion)
- State v. McFadden, 369 S.W.3d 727 (Mo. banc 2012) (jury instruction and curative measures after objection)
