State of Minnesota v. August Latimothy Fleming
883 N.W.2d 790
Minn.2016Background
- Fleming pleaded guilty to possession of a firearm by an ineligible person and second-degree assault tied to a single incident at Folwell Park in Minneapolis.
- The incident involved Fleming firing six shots in a park crowded with children, after a knife stabbing by Doe and a brief pursuit.
- Possession offense is continuing; the shots endangered bystanders and were within the same encounter as the assault.
- The district court imposed an upward durational departure: 90 months for possession, plus a concurrent 36-month assault term, with stays of execution for eight years.
- Fleming appealed claiming the firing related only to the assault and could not support the possession departure; the court of appeals affirmed; the supreme court granted review.
- The central question is whether Minn. Stat. § 244.10, subd. 5a(b) allows upward departure based on an aggravating factor arising from the same course of conduct as another offense.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| May upward departure be based on an aggravating factor arising from the same course of conduct? | Fleming: factor relates to another offense, not the possession conduct | State: § 244.10, subd. 5a(b) allows it | Yes, permitted under § 244.10, subd. 5a(b). |
| Did firing six shots in a park with children make the possession offense significantly more serious? | Fleming: possession completed when gun taken; firing relates to assault | State: possession offense is continuing; firing increases danger | Yes, the conduct made possession more serious and supported departure. |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Banks, 331 N.W.2d 491 (Minn. 1983) (multi-offense rule limitations; relevant to precedent on multiple offenses)
- State v. Zuehlke, 320 N.W.2d 79 (Minn. 1982) (same course of conduct analysis for multiple offenses)
- State v. Johnson, 273 Minn. 394 (Minn. 1966) (single criminal objective; time/place factors)
- State v. Misquadace, 644 N.W.2d 65 (Minn. 2002) (statutory interpretation; de novo review of law questions)
- State v. Edwards, 774 N.W.2d 596 (Minn. 2009) (abuse-of-discretion standard for departures; statutory interpretation context)
- State v. Banks, 331 N.W.2d 491 (Minn. 1983) (discusses multiple offenses and accompanying penalties)
