History
  • No items yet
midpage
279 So.3d 517
La. Ct. App.
2019
Read the full case

Background

  • In 1997 Anthony O. Stokes was convicted by jury of possession with intent to distribute cocaine (under La. R.S. 40:967(A)) based on possession of 50 rocks (6.5 grams) of crack.
  • The State filed a habitual offender bill; after proceedings Stokes was adjudicated a fourth-felony offender, later reduced on appeal to a third-felony offender and ultimately sentenced to life without benefits.
  • Legislative changes (Act 403 and La. R.S. 15:308) made the habitual-offender penalties more lenient and were applied retroactively by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Esteen, prompting resentencing.
  • On remand (Feb. 11, 2019) the trial court resentenced Stokes as a third-felony offender to 60 years at hard labor, the maximum under the amended third-offender range (20–60 years).
  • Stokes appealed, arguing the 60-year sentence is constitutionally excessive; the Fifth Circuit vacated the enhanced sentence as excessive and remanded for resentencing, suggesting an enhanced term between 20–25 years.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument (State) Defendant's Argument (Stokes) Held
Whether the 60-year enhanced sentence imposed after resentencing pursuant to Esteen is unconstitutionally excessive The resentencing complied with Esteen and applicable statutory ranges; the 60-year term is within the amended sentencing range for a third-felony offender The 60-year sentence is grossly disproportionate to the offense and offender, exceeded what original judge intended, and the judge failed to articulate consideration under Art. 894.1 The court held the 60-year enhanced sentence is unconstitutionally excessive, vacated it, and remanded for resentencing (suggesting 20–25 years)

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Stokes, 759 So.2d 980 (La. App. 5 Cir.) (underlying direct-appeal decision reviewing conviction and habitual-offender proceedings)
  • State ex rel. Mims v. Butler, 601 So.2d 649 (La. 1992) (discussing sequencing requirement for habitual-offender predicates)
  • State v. Johnson, 884 So.2d 568 (La. 2004) (overruling Mims; same-day multiple convictions may be counted separately)
  • State ex rel. Esteen v. State, 239 So.3d 233 (La.) (directed resentencings to apply ameliorative habitual-offender provisions retroactively)
  • State v. Arceneaux, 271 So.3d 362 (La. App. 5 Cir.) (held a near-maximum enhanced sentence unconstitutional after Esteen)
  • State v. Evans, 30 So.3d 958 (La. App. 5 Cir.) (upheld a 45-year enhanced sentence as an outlier compared to typical ranges)
  • State v. Baxley, 656 So.2d 973 (La. 1995) (explaining Louisiana constitutional protection against excessive sentences)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State of Louisiana Versus Anthony O. Stokes
Court Name: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Date Published: Sep 4, 2019
Citations: 279 So.3d 517; 19-KA-128
Docket Number: 19-KA-128
Court Abbreviation: La. Ct. App.
Log In
    State of Louisiana Versus Anthony O. Stokes, 279 So.3d 517