State of Iowa v. Melvin Lucier
15-2009
Iowa Ct. App.Nov 23, 2016Background
- Defendant Melvin Lucier appealed convictions for three counts of second-degree sexual abuse of a child.
- Alleged victim (S.D.) was under 12 at the time of the offending and 11 at trial.
- Before testimony, the district court conducted a competency colloquy to assess the child’s ability to distinguish truth from lies.
- Lucier argued the colloquy failed to establish the child could identify the truth (challenging competency).
- The district court found the child competent and credited her testimony and diagrams identifying body parts and acts, concluding at least five sex acts occurred within the charged timeframe.
- On appeal the court reviewed competency for abuse of discretion and factual findings for substantial evidence, and affirmed the convictions and sentence.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument (State) | Defendant's Argument (Lucier) | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Competency to testify | Court’s colloquy showed the child could differentiate truth and lies; she was competent. | Colloquy was inadequate because it showed only ability to identify a lie, not the truth. | Court affirmed competency finding; no abuse of discretion. |
| Sufficiency of evidence for sexual acts | Child’s testimony and diagrams provided substantial evidence of multiple sex acts meeting statute definition. | Testimony and questioning were vague/ confusing as to contact, dates, frequency; insufficient detail. | Court held testimony was sufficiently specific and credible; substantial evidence supported convictions. |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Andrews, 447 N.W.2d 118 (Iowa 1989) (sets out test for child competency to testify)
- State v. Steltzer, 288 N.W.2d 557 (Iowa 1980) (error-preservation principles for appellate review)
- State v. Taylor, 596 N.W.2d 55 (Iowa 1999) (court may overlook preservation defects in certain circumstances)
- State v. Brotherton, 384 N.W.2d 375 (Iowa 1986) (standard of review for competency rulings)
- State v. Hearn, 797 N.W.2d 577 (Iowa 2011) (substantial-evidence standard for fact findings)
- State v. Martens, 569 N.W.2d 482 (Iowa 1997) (victim testimony need not be highly specific to support sexual-abuse finding)
- State v. DeWitt, 811 N.W.2d 460 (Iowa 2012) (weight given to credibility determinations by factfinder)
