State of Iowa v. Lara L. Welch
16-1304
| Iowa Ct. App. | May 17, 2017Background
- Hudson officer ran a plate check and discovered the vehicle’s registered owner (age 77) had an expired license; the driver was younger and identified as Lara Welch, the owner’s daughter.
- Officer engaged Welch, developed reasonable suspicion of impairment, and arrested her for operating while intoxicated (first offense).
- Welch moved to suppress evidence, arguing the officer lacked reasonable suspicion to continue the stop after determining she was not the registered owner.
- District court denied suppression, relying on State v. Jackson; Welch pleaded guilty and thereby (generally) waived suppression challenges.
- After Welch’s plea, the Iowa Supreme Court decided State v. Coleman, overruling Jackson and holding traffic stops must end once reasonable suspicion is gone.
- Welch claimed trial counsel was ineffective for allowing the guilty plea and waiver of the suppression claim; the court affirmed the conviction but preserved the ineffective-assistance claim for postconviction proceedings due to an inadequate record on direct appeal.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether officer lawfully continued the traffic stop after learning the driver was not the registered owner | Officer’s minimal check of driver ID after a lawful stop was permissible under prior precedent (Jackson) and routine traffic enforcement | Continued detention lacked reasonable suspicion under Coleman; stop should have ended when original purpose dispensed | Court affirmed district court (denied suppression) but acknowledged Coleman overruled Jackson and changed law; suppression challenge effectively waived by guilty plea on record before Coleman |
| Whether Welch’s guilty plea waived suppression challenge | A guilty plea waives defenses not intrinsic to plea (Carroll) | Plea should not bar review where law changed after plea and counsel may have been ineffective | Court held plea waived suppression claim on direct appeal but preserved ineffective-assistance claim for collateral review due to inadequate record |
| Whether trial counsel was ineffective for allowing plea that waived suppression claim | Counsel reasonably relied on existing precedent (Jackson) at time of plea | Counsel was ineffective for allowing waiver in light of Coleman and should be allowed to pursue relief | Court expressed doubt Welch could prevail on ineffective-assistance on direct appeal but preserved the claim for postconviction-relief proceedings (record inadequate to resolve now) |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Coleman, 890 N.W.2d 284 (Iowa 2017) (traffic stop must end when reasonable suspicion no longer present; overruled Jackson)
- State v. Jackson, 315 N.W.2d 766 (Iowa 1982) (officer may check driver’s license after lawful stop)
- State v. Carroll, 767 N.W.2d 638 (Iowa 2009) (guilty plea waives non-intrinsic defenses and objections)
- State v. Toles, 885 N.W.2d 407 (Iowa 2016) (ineffective-assistance claim on direct appeal requires adequate record)
- State v. Johnson, 784 N.W.2d 192 (Iowa 2010) (court must preserve ineffective-assistance claims when record is inadequate)
