History
  • No items yet
midpage
State of Iowa v. Kenneth Hoxsey
20-1531
| Iowa Ct. App. | Jan 12, 2022
Read the full case

Background

  • Kenneth Hoxsey pleaded guilty to third-degree burglary and, two weeks later, second-degree burglary.
  • The presentence investigation (PSI) recommended incarceration; the State adopted that recommendation at sentencing.
  • Hoxsey asked for suspended sentences; the district court ordered immediate incarceration based on his criminal history and jail noncompliance.
  • Hoxsey appealed, arguing the court abused its discretion by refusing to suspend his sentences.
  • The appeal raised a jurisdictional question under Iowa Code § 814.6(1)(a)(3) (appeals after guilty pleas require the defendant to establish "good cause"); the State conceded jurisdiction.
  • The Court of Appeals affirmed the sentence, concluding no abuse of discretion and that jurisdiction was proper under controlling precedent.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Jurisdiction: May Hoxsey appeal after a guilty plea (good-cause requirement)? State concedes jurisdiction. Hoxsey did not explicitly brief "good cause" but challenges a discretionary sentence; Damme and Fetner supply good cause. Court exercises jurisdiction: Damme/Fetner establish good cause for discretionary, non-plea‑agreed sentences; State's concession noted.
Abuse of discretion in sentencing: Should the court have suspended the sentence? PSI and State recommended incarceration based on extensive criminal history and prior incarcerations; immediate incarceration is appropriate. Hoxsey argued mitigating factors (time served, acceptance of responsibility, community programs, rehabilitation concerns). No abuse of discretion: sentencing decision within statutory limits and supported by permissible reasons (criminal history, prior sentences, jail noncompliance).

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Damme, 944 N.W.2d 98 (Iowa 2020) (holding good cause exists to appeal a discretionary sentence following a guilty plea when sentence is not mandatory or plea‑agreed)
  • State v. Fetner, 959 N.W.2d 129 (Iowa 2021) (affirming Damme and treating good cause satisfied for such sentencing appeals)
  • Crowell v. State Pub. Def., 845 N.W.2d 676 (Iowa 2014) (appellate courts must sua sponte police jurisdiction)
  • State v. Formaro, 638 N.W.2d 720 (Iowa 2002) (sentences within statutory limits carry a strong presumption of correctness; review for abuse of discretion)
  • State v. Thompson, 951 N.W.2d 1 (Iowa 2020) (clarifying Damme's scope: good cause applies when sentence is discretionary and not plea‑agreed)
  • State v. Tucker, 959 N.W.2d 140 (Iowa 2021) (noting defendant bears the burden to establish good cause on appeal)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State of Iowa v. Kenneth Hoxsey
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Iowa
Date Published: Jan 12, 2022
Docket Number: 20-1531
Court Abbreviation: Iowa Ct. App.