State of Iowa v. Jonathan Antoine Brown
16-1021
| Iowa Ct. App. | Jul 19, 2017Background
- Jonathan Brown was charged with first-degree murder after Timothy Washington died from multiple stab wounds following a fight at a house party on June 21, 2015.
- Multiple eyewitnesses placed Brown in the group fighting Washington and observed Brown holding a knife and stabbing Washington.
- At trial the jury convicted Brown of the lesser-included offense of second-degree murder with a dangerous weapon; court sentenced him to up to 50 years.
- Brown moved in limine to exclude evidence of other stabbings at the party and certain statements from a police-interview video; the trial court admitted both categories of evidence.
- On appeal Brown argued (1) admission of his prior bad acts violated Iowa Rule of Evidence 5.404(b), and (2) admission of law-enforcement statements from the interview was hearsay, violated his Confrontation Clause rights, and was unfairly prejudicial under Iowa Rule of Evidence 5.403.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Admissibility of other-stabbing evidence under Rule 5.404(b) | Evidence showed Brown had a knife and a plan/opportunity; admissible for identity, opportunity, and plan | Evidence was impermissible propensity evidence and should be excluded | Admitted: evidence was relevant to opportunity, identity, and plan, not character propensity |
| Admissibility of law-enforcement statements in police-interview video (hearsay/Confrontation) | Statements were relevant; any error harmless given eyewitness testimony | Statements were hearsay, violated confrontation, prejudiced jury | Any error was harmless because strong eyewitness evidence independently established guilt |
| Rule 5.403 unfair prejudice challenge | Probative value outweighed any prejudice in context | Admission unfairly prejudiced jury against Brown | No reversible error: probative value outweighed prejudice or error harmless in result |
| Ineffective assistance for failing to request limiting instruction | No prejudice shown; outcome would be same | Counsel should have sought limiting instruction to mitigate prejudice | Denied: Brown failed to show reasonable probability of different result |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Huston, 825 N.W.2d 531 (Iowa 2013) (standard of review for evidentiary rulings)
- State v. Huser, 894 N.W.2d 472 (Iowa 2017) (harmless-error analysis for improperly admitted hearsay)
- State v. Kennedy, 846 N.W.2d 517 (Iowa 2014) (assessing what evidence the jury actually considered and comparing probative forces)
- State v. Harris, 891 N.W.2d 182 (Iowa 2017) (standard for ineffective-assistance claims; require probability of different result)
